Official Report: search what was said in Parliament
The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
Searching by different views
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
- Report: this is the whole Official Report for a particular meeting of a committee or Parliament
- Item of business: this is each individual agenda item in an Official Report. For example, Portfolio Questions would be the item of business in a Meeting of the Parliament report
- Contribution: this is each time someone has made a spoken contribution to a meeting.
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
Search by MSP
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
Searching by keyword
There are two types of keyword search:
- A keyword search without quotation marks will look for every instance of each word used and rank the results by frequency and proximity. It will also include variants of the keywords using “porter stemming”. This is when the search looks for the “stem” of a word regardless of its ending. So, for example, a search for [salmon farm] will return each instance of “salmon” and each instance of “farm” as well as potentially including results for “farms”, “farmed” and “farming”.
- A keyword search with quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase used. So, for example, a search for “salmon farm” in quotation marks will only return instances of that exact phrase.
Combining search filters
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
More complex keyword searches
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
- a search for “salmon farm” AND “Loch Lomond” will return only results which include both exact phrases
- a search for “salmon farm” NOT “Loch Lomond” will return results for “salmon farm” but exclude results which also include “Loch Lomond”
- a search for “salmon farm” OR “Loch Lomond” will return all results for “salmon farm” and all results for “Loch Lomond” regardless of whether they appear together
Searching by date
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
- Current session (all Official Reports since the current sessions started)
- Last 6 months
- Last 12 months
- each of the previous sessions of Parliament. (Selecting the information icon above the “Select a time period” menu will give you the exact dates for each session.)
- All sessions
- You can also choose to select a custom date range, although adding a Start or End date will mean the search automatically defaults to this option.
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Criathragan Hide all filters
Displaying 1359 contributions
|
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Effective Scottish Government Decision Making
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Liz Smith
When the Fraser of Allander Institute, the Carnegie Trust and Audit Scotland came before us, they were all clear about the paramount need for clarity of purpose in policy making—that was pretty much the first thing that they all said. In your relationships with Government, when you have assisted with policy, have you felt that that clarity of purpose was there in each case? If not, can you give us an idea of what the problem was?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Effective Scottish Government Decision Making
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Liz Smith
Just on that point, with reference to what Lucy Hughes said, when a policy transcends several Government portfolios—for example, children and young people, or planning—how easy is it to get a common agreement on the delivery of the policy if there are conflicting problems?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Effective Scottish Government Decision Making
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Liz Smith
If we find ourselves in a situation in which a particular policy has failed to deliver the good intention, which sometimes happens, are there adequate processes to ensure that a proper review takes place to establish why the good intention was not implemented and to ask what will be done about it the next time, or do we need to make changes to the existing processes? One difficulty is that the Parliament’s post-legislative facility is quite limited—for a start, we do not have a revising chamber, nor do committees have much time to look at what happens when a policy goes wrong. What could be done to mitigate that and to improve the process so that, if there are failures, we do something about them?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Effective Scottish Government Decision Making
Meeting date: 2 May 2023
Liz Smith
That is an interesting point and an astute observation. Is it a part of the problem that the available data is not as good as it should be?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Effective Scottish Government Decision Making
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Liz Smith
I have just one question. If a piece of legislation has not worked very well and has lots of problems, how effective is the post-legislative scrutiny in the Parliament? Would your group ever be involved in considering why a policy commitment has not worked very well?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Effective Scottish Government Decision Making
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Liz Smith
Thank you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Effective Scottish Government Decision Making
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Liz Smith
I have to say that I think that Scotland is blessed with an awful lot of people who are putting the facts in place for the Government. Perhaps we need a few more organisations like the Fraser of Allander Institute but, nonetheless, I think the ones that we have are pretty objective.
James Black, when you make a submission on, for example, a very objective analysis of the economy, does that submission reach the right circles? I am thinking about the civil servants and Government ministers who will be making some pretty big decisions about the economy. Is the analysis reaching the right quarters?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Scottish Fiscal Commission (Fiscal Sustainability Report)
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Liz Smith
Indeed.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Scottish Fiscal Commission (Fiscal Sustainability Report)
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Liz Smith
You have referred in a number of your projections to the size of the increase in the health spend, which I think you are estimating will be just under 50 per cent of the change—it is about a third now. Obviously, there will also be an increase in the social security spend. Do you have any views on the scope for public sector reform in the economy to address the increase in the costs that we are having to cope with?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Effective Scottish Government Decision Making
Meeting date: 28 March 2023
Liz Smith
I want to ask about data. It was put to us by two former ministers and one civil servant last week that, when it comes to good-quality decision making in the Government, it is essential that good-quality data is available—if the Government chooses to ignore it, that is another matter. Having such data available is critical to good-quality decision making. Are there gaps in the data that it is necessary to put before Government ministers? Is there anything that we can do to improve that?
