The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2368 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
Such schemes are often not within the curtilage of one landowner—they might cover an estate—so paragraph 32 is saying that the legislation is not clear on who is responsible for maintaining them. Do you accept that point?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
I want to quote a couple of other things from the report. First—this relates to an earlier question from the convener—paragraph 32 says:
“Not all critical responsibilities for managing flood risk are covered by legislation. For example, the Act does not set out who is responsible for the maintenance of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems and for managing erosion enhanced flooding (Exhibit 2). This could mean important areas of activity may be missed.”
Do any of you know who is responsible? Mr Flucker, I am looking at you and you are looking at me, so perhaps you can answer.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
Well, Scottish Water is not here.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
Are those cases in which you have said, “You shouldn’t be building there, because there’s a risk of flooding,” and councils have said, “Actually, we’re going to ignore that—we’re going to approve it”?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
I will ask about funding, but, before I do so, I want to pick up on a couple of things that you said, Mr Brannen. You mentioned the flooding advisory service. Can you tell us when you expect that to be set up?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
It will be early next year—is that right?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
I will stick with you, Mr Boyd. Paragraph 65 of the report goes on to say:
“Councils provide high-level reports on expenditure through Local Finance Returns but this does not provide a detailed breakdown and no collective figures are published for flood expenditure.
Stakeholders have highlighted that there is a risk that funds allocated for flooding within councils may have been redirected to other priorities.”
That is quite a claim. Has that been happening?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
Perhaps someone from Scottish Water is watching, and they can get back to us.
In the interests of time, I will leave it there.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay. Fair enough.
I go back to funding. We have touched on major schemes. The biggest scheme, which has not been started yet but is in the pipeline, I hope, is Grangemouth. By the way, anyone can answer this question.
Mr Burnish referenced that schemes could take five years, but Grangemouth has already taken far longer. There was an initial public consultation as far back as 2018, but we still have not agreed who is going to pay for it. It could cost north of £600 million. It is clear that Falkirk Council cannot afford to pay for that. It is a huge scheme—it will be the biggest in Scotland and one of the biggest in the UK if it goes ahead. Can anyone tell me how that should be paid for?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Graham Simpson
You are not telling us anything that we did not know already. You have said that, in your view, it might be done in chunks rather than as one big scheme.