The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1828 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Graham Simpson
Absolutely. It is really stretching.
I will quote from paragraph 14 of your report, but I will convert the figures from kilometres to miles. I was disappointed that, in your report, you fell into the Scottish Government trap of using kilometres and not miles. If I were to ask you how far it is from Edinburgh to Glasgow, you would not give me the distance in kilometres. Just bear with me—I am going to use real money.
The report says:
“To achieve the target, car traffic levels will need to decrease by”
4.5 billion miles to 18 billion miles
“compared to a 2019 baseline. The last time car traffic levels were at this level was in 1994.”
You also say:
“Transport Scotland estimates that to achieve a 20 per cent reduction in car”
miles
“by 2030, public transport capacity would need to increase by 222 per cent.”
None of that is achievable and it never was. Based on that, and based on the lack of a plan, do you think that the Government should just be honest and say that it has ditched the target?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Graham Simpson
That is fine—I am happy to leave it there.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Graham Simpson
I am going to move on. I want to ask about staff education and training, which is another area that has attracted a good deal of interest. WICS has spent around £300,000 on executive education in the form of masters of business administration. I think that you, Mr Satti, have an MBA that you received during your time at WICS, and others have MBAs as well. We have heard about Ms Ashford who went to Harvard. How many of the staff who went on these programmes remain in the business? Obviously you are one, Mr Satti. Of the people who were either sent abroad or elsewhere in Britain on these management programmes, how many are still in the business?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Graham Simpson
Have you budgeted for that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Graham Simpson
I am genuinely interested, because I am not sure how you can measure the performance of a state-run monopoly. What are you comparing it with? I would be interested in that.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay. Mr Hinds, as chair of the board, have you had any comments about the culture of the organisation from current or previous employees?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Graham Simpson
So that was part of the lure to get Mr Plant here.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Graham Simpson
How many people does that apply to? Is it everyone?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Graham Simpson
It has been done. That is a great idea, then.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Graham Simpson
That could be done. There you go, Mr Brannen—a good idea for you. You could press for some of that money to come back.
I feel that I ought to ask about the correspondence that we received from the former chief executive, because he made a couple of points that I want to put to you. He says in his written submission that the corporate plan
“allowed for expenditure to develop”
WICS’s
“international footprint”
and that there was
“an agreed allowance for the development of WICS’ international activity.”
Is that the case? I guess that that is a question for the Government.