The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1828 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Graham Simpson
I am a pretty calm guy, believe it or not, but when I was going through all of this, I found myself getting angrier and angrier just reading the various items of expenditure. For example, appendix 3 of the Grant Thornton report sets out
“Sampled expenditure with no itemised receipts”.
That table contains a number of things. Here is a meal, for instance: £566 for “Dinner for four people” at La Garrigue in Edinburgh. The convener has mentioned the dinner at L’escargot Blanc—I do not think that that restaurant exists any more but it can correct me if I am wrong—and there was a meal in Gaucho Edinburgh. There were also costs relating to a Barbados study tour—what was that particular one all about?
11:00Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Graham Simpson
Are you saying that Ms Quinn is wrong?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Graham Simpson
Is she right or wrong? Is her version of events accurate?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Graham Simpson
There have been a number of internal and external meetings for which you have hired places at various costs. The best value appears to have been when you hired a meeting room from Volunteer Scotland for £66, which included refreshments. That was pretty good, but the costs went up for other meetings. I am not criticising the venues at all—they charge what they charge. The question is why you paid it. Other venues included the InterContinental Edinburgh the George, where meeting room hire, including lunch and refreshments for—oh, it is your friends from New Zealand again—a New Zealand study tour cost £862.40. Why did you pay that sort of amount?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Graham Simpson
So you will not need to hire such venues in the future.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Graham Simpson
How many KCs are on retainers under the public purse?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Graham Simpson
I will ask about the PR agency 3x1. Mr Satti, you wrote on 11 June about a “drip drip” of headlines. Did you take on 3x1 to minimise that?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Graham Simpson
I have one more question for now, and there will be others later.
In the same email in which you talk about the “drip drip” of headlines, you say:
“WICS spent on average 1.5% of revenues on training (less than Audit Scotland I believe).”
I think that Mr MacRae referred to that. Do you think that it was appropriate to bring Audit Scotland into that email?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Graham Simpson
I want to follow up on Jamie Greene’s line of questioning, because there were aspects that, in my view, were not fully answered.
Mr MacRae, Jamie Greene asked whether you accepted, in relation to the letter from Màiri McAllan, that the board failed to follow due process. That is a straight yes or no question. Did you fail to follow due process?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 September 2024
Graham Simpson
No, I am asking you. Did you fail to follow due process?