The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1828 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2024
Graham Simpson
Okay. The convener wants me to ask about specific areas, and I am quite happy to do that.
If we look at payroll, there has been an issue with including—or not including—immigration data. I noted that it had not been included in two years—2018-19 and 2020-21. You had some comments on that. What would be the value of including that sort of data?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2024
Graham Simpson
So, that is because of the Home Office.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2024
Graham Simpson
Audit Scotland has commented previously that immigration data could, for example, help to identify students who are getting funding from the Student Awards Agency for Scotland when they are not entitled to it. That is quite important, is it not?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2024
Graham Simpson
Right. It seems to be really important to have that information. Just to accept the situation—just to accept what the Home Office is saying—is maybe not the right approach. Maybe somebody should be going back to the Home Office to say, “This information is almost vital to this exercise, so could you provide it?” Can you test it again?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2024
Graham Simpson
At the least, it could ask.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2024
Graham Simpson
I am happy to leave it there for now, convener.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2024
Graham Simpson
I have a couple of questions, convener, if you do not mind.
I just want to get it clear in my head how this operates in practice. You have all these bodies taking part and sharing information about people, but how does it work? Is there a constant sharing of information, with computer systems talking to each other, and then at some point somebody will flash up on a screen as having done something wrong, or are people poring over documents, trying to join dots and pick up fraud?
09:15Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2024
Graham Simpson
Does anyone get prosecuted as a result of this exercise?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2024
Graham Simpson
I have to say that that does not sound like very many, given the scale of the exercise.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 26 September 2024
Graham Simpson
Before I do so, convener, I would just like to follow up the convener’s line of questioning, which sparked a thought in me. I suppose that it goes back to what I was asking earlier. What is the point of, or—I should say—benefit to a public body of being part of this exercise? What do they get from it?