The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1828 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Graham Simpson
Good morning. I want to follow up on the question about brokerage. People watching this meeting might not know what brokerage is. If I might put it in layman’s terms, it is about bailing out boards because they are overspending and need extra money. To follow up on Colin Beattie’s question, which I do not think was fully answered, what happens if a board says, “We just can’t do it—we need extra money”? Mr Gray, I know that you want to move away from that model—and rightly so—but there will be circumstances where boards just cannot meet their budgets. What will you do then?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Graham Simpson
Are you saying that the conversation has started?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Graham Simpson
Oh, it has.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Graham Simpson
You mentioned varicose veins.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Graham Simpson
In that continuing conversation, are you considering things that are of limited clinical value? I point you to what the Auditor General says:
“The Scottish Government and NHS boards should:
Ahead of 2025/26, jointly identify areas of limited clinical value and consider how services can be provided more efficiently, or withdrawn”.
When I asked him about that, the Auditor General told me:
“The Government itself, in its clinical strategy from 2016, cited a source that said that 20 per cent of medical interventions were of limited value. In our view, there needs to be transparency around what interventions exactly, in the Government’s view, are of limited clinical value”—[Official Report, Public Audit Committee, 12 December 2024; c11.]
Can you tell me what medicines and procedures are of limited or low clinical value and whether you have decided which ones you do not want to proceed with?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Graham Simpson
GP practices are private businesses. On a practical level, you cannot make them do anything. The cabinet secretary might have the ambition to end the 8 am rush, but, realistically, he cannot enforce that, can he?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Graham Simpson
Okay. We will await developments—or not.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Graham Simpson
That is good—it gives me a degree of confidence and hope that the yard can win new work, which is, I think, what everyone wants.
I want to ask about something that came up in last week’s committee meeting. We heard that various pay-offs, including some that had not been approved by the Government, were made to staff at the yard. In fact, there was one instance of an employee, who had been transferred to the yard, being paid after he had set up a limited company, which struck me as outrageous. That should not be happening. Mr Irwin, is it fair to say that, as you did not know about that case, you had taken your eye off the ball?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Graham Simpson
That is good. We will stick to Ferguson Marine for now, given that it has been the theme of a few questions.
I have a question about the procurement for the small vessel replacement programme, which goes back to a question that the convener asked. If CMAL, which is the procuring authority, were to advise that another bidder should get the contract but ministers overruled it and the contract went to Ferguson Marine, would the reasoning for that decision be published?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Graham Simpson
Were that to happen, what level of detail should the committee expect to get? I am not saying that it will happen, but if it did happen, what could we expect to be told?