The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2770 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Graham Simpson
That is from BMA Scotland. That came out just this morning, and I appreciate that you have not seen it, but it raises issues that very much relate to what the Auditor General has written about.
I was struck, after reading that quote, to find that the Private Healthcare Information Network issued a report this week—you might have seen it. It says that private hospital admissions are now hitting “record levels”. People are increasingly turning to paying for their own treatment. It was reported that
“Cataracts were the most common reason for admission”
and were
“up by 5 per cent.”
That is followed by hip replacements and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Interestingly, there are
“more consultants … active in private practice in Scotland than ever before.”
At the same time as we have those vacancies in the NHS, consultants are increasingly turning to work in private practice. That is not right, is it?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Graham Simpson
Yes.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Graham Simpson
We have spoken previously about the national review of procedures, which is about looking at procedures and medicines that might be of limited clinical value, doing things better and not doing things that we do not need to do. In our evidence session with NHS Ayrshire and Arran and NHS Grampian, they said that they have submitted their thoughts on that—to you, I presume. Where are we with the national review? Are we in a position to make some decisions?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Graham Simpson
Do we now have a list of procedures that we are either not doing or doing less of?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Graham Simpson
Where would we find that information?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Graham Simpson
Okay. You told us about varicose veins previously, so we will add tattoo removal to the list.
What about medicines? The Auditor General’s report shows that the cost of prescribing is going up year on year, which I know that you have been looking at. At some point, we need to get a grip of that. What can you tell us about it?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Graham Simpson
If you have a list of medicines that are of lower clinical value, are you preventing any of them from being prescribed?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Graham Simpson
Have you looked at medicines that are prescribed that could easily be bought over the counter for possibly less money than it would cost the NHS?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Graham Simpson
Let me give you a personal example. Recently, I had an allergic reaction to something and I came out in a rash that was quite itchy. I was in Edinburgh—I was not at home—so I went into a pharmacy. They were very good and gave me some antihistamines and some cream to deal with the itch. I could have bought those things myself and I wanted to pay for them, but they were given to me for nothing and I have never used the cream. I did not go to get free stuff; I just wanted some assistance, but I was given the medication for free. What did the pharmacy make from that? Would it have earned less if I had bought it from them?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Graham Simpson
Before I move on, I think that Joe FitzPatrick wants to ask something about this.