The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2691 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson
We have received a letter from Carers Scotland. I do not know whether you have seen it.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson
As with Joe FitzPatrick, a lot of what I was going to ask has been covered, but I will pick up on the point about people being overpaid, because it is a serious point. Even though it might affect only a small number of people, they might have been overpaid significant amounts. Throughout this period, a number of people will have passed away who were not getting enough or who were getting too much. What is happening in those cases?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson
Do we know whether that has been going on? Just imagine that you are a widow or a widower and, unbeknown to you, your partner has not been getting enough pension or has been getting too much. Suddenly, you get either a letter saying, “We owe you this” or one that says, “You owe us that.” Has that been happening?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson
The term “rosy picture” was used earlier, and you said that it is not quite a rosy picture, which it is not, is it? The figures in the Auditor General’s report—there is a graph, which is exhibit 1—shows that there was, as you would expect, a huge dip in delayed discharges during Covid, then it rocketed, and now it is basically a straight line. It is stubbornly high and is not coming down. There is the occasional blip, but, in essence, it is high. It is probably higher than it has ever been, and we do not seem to be getting any improvement. Why is that, given that we have known about the issue for years?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson
The Auditor General had to resort to coming up with figures of his own. In paragraph 26, he tells us that it is cheaper to have someone in a care home than in hospital. If that is the case, why are we not properly funding care places in order partly to fix the problem?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson
Okay.
I have one last question. I have noticed that there are a number of working groups and strategies around. You have mentioned the collaborative response and assurance group, or CRAG. There is also the national care service advisory board, whose remit is
“to provide advice and suggest where improvements could be made”,
and the health and social care delayed discharge and hospital occupancy action plan—I am not sure how that is coming along. We also have the rapid peer response and support team, which provides
“targeted support to IAs struggling with persistent delayed discharge pressures”.
How effective do you think all these committees and plans are?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Reform)
I completely agree with what the convener has just said.
I will now go back to the issue of power of attorney, which the convener explored earlier. It is important for people to have that in place. I was reflecting on experiences that I have had, and there are cases where people’s health goes downhill very quickly, so there is not time to put a power of attorney in place. Do you think, therefore, that maybe we need to put in place a system that deals with such situations so that families can act quickly?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson
You have not, so I will quote from it, if that is okay. The letter came last month and it refers to a Carers Scotland report called “State of Caring”, which was published in November 2025 and which found that
“just 34% of unpaid carers said they were involved in decisions about discharge and what care and treatment was needed. Only 13% had been asked about their ability and willingness to provide care, down from 19% in 2024 and just 12% felt they had been provided with sufficient support on discharge to protect their health and wellbeing and that of the person they care for.”
If those figures are to be believed, and I have no reason to disbelieve them, they are pretty shocking, are they not?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Graham Simpson
Okay. Committee members have probably not had the chance to read the letter that was written to the convener of the Finance and Public Administration committee and forwarded to this committee. Interestingly, the letter says that a meeting is scheduled today between
“the SPPA Chief Executive and Minister for Parliamentary Business … with an agenda focused on a ‘deep dive’ of McCloud Remedy delivery in the police pensions immediate choice cohort”—
whatever that is—
“member communications and engagement, and SPPA resources.”
I do not have a question for the Auditor General about that, but I wanted to highlight that there is a meeting today and that it would be good for us to hear about its outcome.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Graham Simpson
Is it done geographically? Might there be one person for Glasgow and one for Edinburgh, for example?