Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 5 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1828 contributions

|

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Evidence

Meeting date: 1 March 2022

Graham Simpson

So this just gives people the option to register a death remotely.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Evidence

Meeting date: 1 March 2022

Graham Simpson

Okay. I thought that it might be useful to go through the instrument in question, which contains a number of provisions, and to hear your thoughts on each of them. I might not cover them all, but I will go through them quickly. Some are quite straightforward.

The first provision relates to the ability to register deaths and stillbirths remotely. Does that give people a choice? Does it have to be done remotely, or can people still pop into an office to register a death or stillbirth in person?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Evidence

Meeting date: 1 March 2022

Graham Simpson

The instrument gives councils a power over public outdoor spaces, and we could describe parks in that way. Why would councils need powers to do anything in public outdoor spaces for the next six months?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Evidence

Meeting date: 1 March 2022

Graham Simpson

You have not, however, used those powers.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instruments subject to Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 1 March 2022

Graham Simpson

As we heard earlier, the instrument extends the powers given to councils for another six months in relation to premises, events and public outdoor spaces. Given where we are with the health situation, I cannot see a justification for councils hanging on to those powers for another six months. In the circumstances, I will vote against the instrument.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Graham Simpson

Far from the minister saying that she will be prepared to, or could, call in schemes or direct councils on what the charges should be, she is clearly not prepared to do that.

She mentioned Nottingham, which is a very interesting example. Nottingham is about to increase what it charges companies. The reason for that—the minister, probably, and Mr Ruskell, certainly, will rejoice at this—is that the money that is taken in by the Nottingham scheme has gone down, because fewer people need parking spaces. Mr Ruskell will think that that is a good thing. However, in order to fill the gap, the council is increasing the charges. That leads us to the conclusion that, in Nottingham, the example so lauded by some people around this table, the charge is actually a money-making scheme.

If the minister wants to press ahead with the scheme, she should at least fix the cap element of the regulations. I am sure that she could do that.

Exemptions have been mentioned, and the Scottish Police Federation made some very strong comments about that. Calum Steele, its general secretary, fears that the charge could be passed on to rank-and-file police officers. However, if it were not to be passed on to them, it could hit overstretched police budgets.

Unions have come out against the scheme. Keir Greenaway, senior organiser for GMB Scotland, said that the lowest-paid workers would suffer at the worst possible time, with the rising cost of living. He is absolutely right.

As I pointed out two weeks ago, more than half of the employers in Nottingham have passed the parking levy, which is set to be nearly £500 a year per parking space, on to their staff. Some of those staff will be low paid. The scheme is a regressive tax.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Graham Simpson

You said in your opening comments that the instrument had been delayed because of Covid. As I have pointed out, businesses are still struggling. Why do you think that now is the right time to introduce the instrument?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Graham Simpson

Will the minister give way?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Graham Simpson

It is not a matter of not trusting local councils. Fiona Hyslop helpfully mentioned our previous local government manifesto. I was the author of that, so I agree with every word of it. We will wait and see what transpires for the next local government elections.

It is not a matter of not trusting local councils. The minister has the power to introduce exemptions, and she could set those out. I actually made that point during the passage of the 2019 act. I tried to get an exemption into the act for shift workers and people who do not live or work near public transport. Unfortunately, I was unsuccessful. That will be a real concern if the measure goes through.

I will end there, because we have probably spent long enough on this and we have explored all the issues. I will press the motion to annul.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 22 February 2022

Graham Simpson

I have just one quick question, and possibly a follow-up question, depending on the answer. I feel that we have already had a full debate, even though the debate is yet to come.

Minister, can you confirm that, under the 2019 act, you have powers to set out in regulations further exemptions beyond those that already exist?