The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1828 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
Thanks, convener, and thank you for coming along this morning, Mr Swinney.
I want to start by asking you about the made affirmative versus affirmative procedure business, so that we have your comments on the record. In that respect, I will focus on the Coronavirus Act 2020 (Alteration of Expiry Date) (Scotland) Regulations 2022 (SSI 2022/40). Although the instrument was laid under the made affirmative procedure, the Government has now accepted what it did not accept at the start of the process, which is that it could have used the affirmative procedure. In reality, it makes no practical difference, given the timescale that you have allowed, but you accept that you could have used the affirmative procedure in this case.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
But that was, in fact, incorrect.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
It sounds eminently sensible, like something that you might want to keep in perpetuity.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
Obviously, with the mass vaccination scenario that we have had there needs to be that flexibility.
11:45Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
You are asking for an extra six months for a power that you never used during a pandemic that was, at times, pretty hairy and scary for people—not so much now, thankfully. You want to hang on to powers that were never used while you relied on guidance. I have not heard a justification for that.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
I would not wish you to repeat yourself.
I have one more question. I have an issue with that provision, although I can see the validity of those that we discussed earlier. Have you considered, or would you consider splitting up the regulations, so that parliamentarians who feel able to support some of them, but not all, would be able to do so?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
I am not really sure whether that was a yes or a no; I think that it was a no.
Convener, I have not touched on the local authorities instrument. If somebody else wants to pick up on that, that is fine, but I am happy to ask about that instrument if you want.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
Bring in Bill Kidd. My question was on the other instrument.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
Thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Graham Simpson
That was a very useful session that we had with the Deputy First Minister just now.
The instrument deals with a number of areas. I could be content with some of them, but there is one that I am really not comfortable with, which is the power to close student accommodation and boarding accommodation. As we heard during the earlier discussion, the power has never been used during the entire pandemic—the Government has relied on guidance—so I can see no justification for hanging on to it for another six months. I do not think that Mr Swinney made a compelling argument for doing so. If the Government did not use a power—which was an emergency power—during the height of the pandemic, I can see no justification for hanging on to it now that we are in a much better place than we have been.
The instrument throws up the issue of what happens when we, as parliamentarians, are asked to approve instruments that contain a number of provisions, some of which we like and some of which we do not. There needs to be some flexibility in the system to allow us all to pick and choose. If that could be reported to the lead committee, that would be useful.
On the basis that I do not like one of the provisions, I will vote against the instrument, but I would much rather have the ability to pick off any provisions that I do not like. However, that option is unfortunately not available to us. On that basis, I will vote against it.