The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1828 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Graham Simpson
That is helpful. I can see that you are struggling to agree with me. I will help you: I will engage with you and not press amendment 20. I think that we can find common ground ahead of stage 3. I hope that we can, because that would be helpful to everyone. As experienced members know—certainly those of us who have served on the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee—it is very difficult, not just for MSPs but for members of the public, to jump between pieces of legislation, so it is useful to have everything in one place.
I will not press amendment 20, on the basis that I think that we can work on an amendment for stage 3.
Amendment 20, by agreement, withdrawn.
Amendment 4 not moved.
Section 4, as amended, agreed to.
After section 4
Amendment 48 not moved.
Amendment 92 not moved.
Amendment 125 moved—[Russell Findlay].
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Graham Simpson
It is. I seek clarity on the STPR2 delivery plan, which Andy Park mentioned. The minister’s response to the committee says that that delivery plan will be published “later this year”. Mr Park has just said that there is slippage on that. He used the word “spring”, which can mean quite a bit.
People have been waiting for the plan for some time. The committee’s report refers quite heavily to the road network, which is why Mr Halcro Johnston was asking about it. Why is there slippage, and when exactly will we see the plan?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Graham Simpson
You are getting support from Scottish National Party members, which is not surprising.
Are you saying that it will be out by March?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Graham Simpson
I apologise for the chuntering in the background.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Graham Simpson
Has work been done to assess what facilities there are in Scotland and what their condition is?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Graham Simpson
That is very useful. I might well take the matter up with you later, Mr Park, as you seem to have a keen interest in the subject.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Graham Simpson
Good. Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Graham Simpson
Minister, as I said at the start, that does not seem to me to be a particularly difficult thing to do. Someone just needs to drive round Scotland’s main roads, call in at places, and have a look. It is not that tricky. We just need to get on with it.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Graham Simpson
Good morning, minister. The committee’s report, to which you responded, was on the supply chain. It is clear that logistics are an important aspect of the supply chain. I was not a member of the committee when it did its inquiry, but I have read the report and your response. As has been said, it was a wide-ranging report. Part of it related to the logistics industry and, in particular, lorry drivers. During the pandemic, we could see that there was a shortage of lorry drivers. In fact, that is a long-standing issue that existed before the pandemic.
The committee identified two problems: the fact that we do not have enough lorry drivers; and the facilities that lorry drivers have to put up with, which are sometimes rank rotten. They really should not have to put up with some of the facilities that are out there. I am not necessarily talking about facilities in Scotland—there is a problem throughout the UK. I think that your letter to the committee refers to that. We need to know what is out there and what the offer is for lorry drivers in Scotland. We need to know what facilities there are.
First, have we started that piece of work? We have been talking about it for long enough. It should not be that difficult to find out what rest and welfare facilities there are in Scotland, and it should not be difficult to find out what condition they are in. We just need to get on with it and work with the industry to make improvements where they are needed.
Secondly, we need to know how many lorry drivers we need.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Graham Simpson
Okay. I will move on to a slightly different area, but will stay on logistics. My question is about electric vehicles. I know that they are not in your brief, but this is about logistics, and we want to decarbonise transport.
The recent report by the cross-party group on sustainable transport highlighted the fact that deliveries increased during the pandemic, with more vans on the road, and that, although more people are switching their private vehicles to electric, we are actually seeing more petrol and diesel vans on the road. As a result, we need a modal shift in delivery vehicles, but the infrastructure to do that needs to be there, and it is not at the moment. What are we doing about that?
10:30