The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2192 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
She might well do that. There are some geographically huge regions, but if we are going to have a system, we just have to work it out. We just have to accept it.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
The person would actually have to be locked up.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Yes.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I see what you mean. Focusing on recall, I have tried to come up with a fair and proportionate system.
I am racking my brains to think which bit you are referring to that would—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Correct.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I accept that there is a different route in, but you are talking about removing somebody’s livelihood and taking them away from a very important public role. I think that it is fair that whoever that is should be able to make their case to the electorate and say, “I should stay and this is why.” If we do not have a system in which a member can do that, it opens a can of worms, and we might be justified in saying that we should look at whether the constituency members should be removed in a different way. I am trying to create a system that is fair to everyone.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I did not choose that system because the Welsh had not come up with anything when I was looking at my system. When I was asked about that in front of the Senedd committee, I said that if they were going to this entirely list-based system—which is what they have chosen to do in Wales, although why they would want to do so is beyond me—then they could almost design their own, because they would not have to deal with a Westminster first-past-the-post system, which we have here as well, or wrestle with the issues that I have had to wrestle with. They will have only one system. They have one system; we have two systems—that is why I have gone down the road that I have. I would have done the same even if the Welsh had made up their minds before I started working on my bill.
10:00Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
Correct.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
As I have said, I have tried to work within the electoral system that we have, which says that if a regional MSP resigns or leaves, they are to be replaced by the next person on the list. There is no provision to have a by-election. Therefore, to introduce such a system would be a pretty big move. I am not saying that it is a totally daft idea, but you would be, in effect, almost redoing our electoral system and the rules surrounding it. My bill does not do that—it works within the system that we have.
If we were to introduce the idea of regional by-elections, we would potentially get away from the proportionality of the d’Hondt system, which would be a very big step. We could take it a stage further and ask why, if we should have a by-election for somebody who is recalled, we would not have a by-election for somebody who, for whatever reason—there could be a variety of reasons—resigned. That would be a big move.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Graham Simpson
I can. It is my view that, if you are elected to this place, it is not unreasonable to expect that you might just occasionally turn up, unless you have a valid reason for not doing so.
I know that we currently have remote working arrangements, but I just do not think that it is acceptable for any member of this Parliament to sit at home and operate remotely for the entire five years of their elected period, and I do not think that the public would think that that was acceptable either. That would not be acceptable in any other workplace, so why should we be any different?
Clearly, as I said earlier, if someone has a good reason why they cannot be in the building, that is fine and we need to respect that—there could be a host of good reasons why people cannot come in. However, if they are physically able to come in, they should.