The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 488 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
Maurice Golden
Thank you.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Maurice Golden
Professor McEwen, do you have any comments or thoughts on that?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Maurice Golden
It is clear that the internal market act applies equally, but that brings up questions about what existing legislation was in place that brings new legislation into the scope of the act. For example, the legislation for the deposit return scheme was through in advance, so it should be able to be implemented without respect to the internal market act. However, in England and Wales, a deposit return scheme would need to be implemented with cognisance taken of the internal market act, which could lead to detrimental implications for England and advantages for Scotland, certainly from a business point of view.
It is clear that, in that example and many others, one solution is the integration of common frameworks to overlay the internal market act. What specific dispute resolution mechanisms can be put in place in advance for where that fails or where future Governments in any of the countries seek to dispute those common frameworks, to try to ensure that we comply with existing legislation and allow any of the devolved Administrations to improve regulations or make legislative changes as they see fit?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Maurice Golden
If we park for a moment the question of what might be acceptable to all parties, in your opinion, what could be put in place from a legal perspective to improve the Northern Ireland protocol?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Maurice Golden
Thank you, Professor Weatherill. That is very helpful. Would Professor Jo Hunt like to come in on that?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Maurice Golden
I will move on to Seamus Leheny. You can feel free to comment on that question, but I also want to ask you a more practical question. Aside from just having no checks, are there any technological improvements that can allow more frictionless trade? Is there anything, whether it be QR coding or open data sharing among logistics firms, that is ready to be deployed or is on the horizon?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Maurice Golden
I see that Professor Pittock has no additional comments, so I move to a slightly different subject area, which is how Scottish elected representatives engage with the EU. The Committee of the Regions is an EU advisory body that is composed of local and regional elected representatives. Should Scottish elected representatives engage with the Committee of the Regions, and if so, how?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Maurice Golden
Dr Marks, in its submission, the Law Society of Scotland emphasised that it would welcome the Scottish Parliament’s having oversight of the decision not to align with EU law. Can you expand on that issue and say what parliamentary oversight would be welcome and what form it would take?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2021
Maurice Golden
Would any of the other panel members like to comment?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 18 November 2021
Maurice Golden
I have a specific question for Professor Armstrong. I found the three interesting case studies in the submission to be very helpful, and I am interested in whether the non-discrimination principle applies to the deposit return scheme. Is there anything that we can do in advance to safeguard against potential litigation? If not, would the scheme need to be delayed until a court gave its ruling on which principle might apply?