The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 498 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Maurice Golden
It would be useful if the body were brand new and, therefore, independent. I appreciate Mark Ruskell’s point about considering whether this could be a UK-wide function—that might make more sense—but in that case we would also need a UK-wide circular economy strategy.
One alternative could be to make the advisory role a function of the UK CCC, which is an existing body. My reticence about Zero Waste Scotland having the role is that, in essence, the Government would be funding itself to tell itself how it is doing with delivering policy. That would indeed be circular, but it is not the sort of circularity that we want.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Maurice Golden
Will Mark Ruskell take an intervention?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Maurice Golden
We have had a really useful discussion. It must be noted that the designated body could be an existing body, as suggested in amendment 141, and I think that there is more to consider in the proposals with regard to consistency in application of funding, policy direction and sector plans. Ultimately, I think that an advisory body would be useful, but, given the comments, I will seek to withdraw amendment 141.
Amendment 141, by agreement, withdrawn.
Amendments 187 and 188 not moved.
Section 2 agreed to.
Section 3—Publication and laying of strategy
Amendment 2 not moved.
Amendment 3 moved—[Graham Simpson].
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Maurice Golden
Yes.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Maurice Golden
Yes, that might be a necessity, and it would be similar to how, say, independent commissioners operate. A good example would be the Scottish Veterans Commissioner; that body is funded, but it is also independent. There is a difference between an organisation such as Zero Waste Scotland, all of whose functions are funded by the Scottish Government, and a specific body or entity that is designed to scrutinise the Government. Does my formulation make sense?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Maurice Golden
I will, but I want to finish this point about consistency.
Another major change has been the diversion of millions of pounds from supporting local authorities to supporting businesses. I am not commenting on whether that is correct or incorrect, but a lot of the amendments that we are considering are about supporting local authority funding. That move was, at least in part, a result of a change in emphasis that was not scrutinised by the Parliament. The fact is that people might not even know that fairly major changes in policy application were happening, and an advisory body would scrutinise such changes and make them transparent. If a policy intention changes, as is legitimate for the Government to do, we and the people of Scotland deserve to know about it.
I will give way to Mark Ruskell and then Graham Simpson.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2024
Maurice Golden
No. I was just highlighting an example of something that the Scottish Government funds and which I think most members would agree is independent. The two things can sit alongside each other.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Maurice Golden
Is it likely that the issue of public education about SLAPPs will be included in the consultation? Can you tell the committee about that?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Maurice Golden
I am interested in the motivation behind the consultation. Is that a result of this petition or of the Scottish Government’s policy of ensuring continuity with EU law? Can you explain that?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Maurice Golden
Is the minister concerned about the potential time lag between developments elsewhere and those in Scotland and about how that could expose Scotland to SLAPPs?