The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2536 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Willie Coffey
::That does not sound like an appeals process to me, though.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Willie Coffey
::Okay—thank you for that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Willie Coffey
::Good morning. It is good to hear the extent of your collaboration with COSLA on the policy and the flexibilities that have been introduced. However, one issue that kept cropping up during our consideration was whether, in principle, it is fair to introduce a higher premium for a second home, when people have probably already paid significant amounts in land and buildings transaction tax and so on in order to get the property.
I would appreciate a comment from you, cabinet secretary, on how the principle of fairness applies to the policy, and whether it is fair and so on.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Willie Coffey
::Would the process that you have outlined come about by way of an appeal? For example, if a person found that the local authority was asking for a 200 per cent premium and they chose to disagree with that, would there be an appeals process at that point?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Willie Coffey
::I have a follow-on question for the cabinet secretary. What protections are there for people who face unlimited rent increases if they live in BTR properties of fewer than six units? You have said that it is a fair level, having looked at all the data that you have, but does it mean that, below that level, people are at risk of unlimited rent increases?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Willie Coffey
::Right—a standard appeal covers it.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Willie Coffey
::Good morning. With regard to the appeals process, is it possible that accommodation providers and others could appeal the purpose for which a local authority wishes to spend the proceeds from the visitor levy? The draft regulations state that the appeals process relates to
“decisions of a local authority relating to the operation of a … Visitor Levy scheme”
in its entirety. Does that stretch to cover what the local authority intends to do with the visitor levy receipts?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Willie Coffey
::Okay. Thanks for that, David.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Willie Coffey
Okay, that was really interesting. Tom, do you have a view on long-term empty properties and whether the council tax premium will make the situation worse or better? What do you think?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Willie Coffey
Okay. In that case, I will come back to Anna Gardiner.
What is your opinion of the overall fairness of applying higher premiums to second homes, long-term empties and so forth? After all, the people who own these properties are already paying the land and buildings transaction tax, for example. What is your view of that payment burden on the people who own empties and second homes?