The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2412 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Good morning, everyone. I want to ask how the Government plans to ensure that consumers will embrace the process. Perhaps you could also say a bit about the software interface that will be on offer to assist consumers. I have looked at the interface, and it seems a wee bit clunky and difficult to navigate. Could you talk about how we can get people on board with us and how we can make the interface simpler?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Will the software that drives all of that just be launched, or will there be a period of testing and trialling it and so on?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Many thanks.
10:00Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Are we seriously going to ask folk how many times a week they have a shower?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Coffey
On the whole fakery agenda, there are some incredibly good things out there, but there is some really dangerous stuff going on as well. Peter Proud talked in a lighthearted way about talking to himself on Teams—to a faked AI bot—and a much more sinister application of that kind of thing is possible. I was trying to get to the heart of the AI tools themselves. Is it impossible to build in any conscience in AI software models or do we just have to oversee it working in practice and take some steps to try to moderate it or to protect people?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Coffey
What a fantastic conversation we are having this morning. As an old computer scientist and software designer from the 1970s who encountered AI at Strathclyde and wondered what the future would hold, it is with a mixture of wonderment, amazement and horror that I watch what is unfolding. I want to touch base with you and get your views on the ethical side of all this and whether there is any ethical dimension to AI whatsoever.
Peter Proud, you have given us a few examples this morning. One of the things that I have seen more recently on Facebook, which about 3 billion people on the planet use, is that as soon as you do something on there, you are bombarded forever, are you not? If you go to buy a washing machine, you do not get hundreds of salesmen coming to your door five minutes later, but you get bombarded in that way on Facebook. That is a simple example, but it illustrates where there is a lack of control or understanding and where the boundary between support and intrusion can be crossed. How on earth do we begin to build in protections for citizens in the rapid development that we are seeing?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Thanks very much for that. How do we ever get to a point where the citizen can shape these tools? My experience is that they do things for you, but they also do a lot of things to you whether you like it or not, such as in the Facebook example, where they bombard you with adverts and so on that you might not like. How do we ever get to a position where a decent, honest citizen can participate in shaping what these models do in the future? That is about building an ethical framework into the mix somehow, but how do we get that replicated in the tools that will be let loose on us in the next five, 10 or 20 years? How do we make sure that that is a key element in the design of AI systems for the future?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Coffey
They want to sell you things.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Peter Proud, will AI models ever have an ethical bone in their virtual bodies?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Many thanks for that.