The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2438 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Willie Coffey
It really did. What is the public’s attitude to slush? If it is cheaper, do people care?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Thank you, both.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Willie Coffey
How do we persuade the single-billionaire company that you mentioned earlier to embrace this and to observe the ethical standards that we might want to deploy across the AI sector? How do we persuade that single-person company to do that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Okay. Absolutely fascinating, guys. Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Thank you for that, Leo. Turning to you, Steve Aitken, and the wider issue of the ethical battle, should there be an ethical blanket thrown over the whole AI revolution? Is it possible to do that? Is it always going to be the fight that Leo Fakhrul describes? Can we win that battle, and should we try to win that battle?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Good morning. I will start with Leo Fakhrul. We are always going to need XYNQ because, by the sounds of it, we are always going to need to retaliate against the bad-faith actors. The committee was talking earlier about whether to embed the ethical approach and whether that is possible. I will come to Steve Aitken in a moment to ask more about that.
Leo, without giving any of your secrets away, can you say whether we can successfully do what you are setting out to do? Will we be able to prevent fraud today, although it will reappear in another form tomorrow? Will it be an endless journey for companies such as yours to retaliate against fraud? Is that what we will be seeing now and into the future—a constant fight between good-faith actors and bad-faith actors?
11:30Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Willie Coffey
Thanks for that. Dex Hunter-Torricke, how can we throw an ethical blanket around this whole thing? Is it impossible or is it yet still possible? If so, who should do it?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Willie Coffey
You may have heard Dex Hunter-Torricke telling us earlier about the advent of the corporate billion-dollar company with a single person in control. How do we persuade such a person to embrace an ethical framework and ethical standards? Is that a journey that we just have to keep working on and fighting to achieve?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Willie Coffey
What about creativity?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Willie Coffey
That goes into the area that Gordon MacDonald led us into—regulation, control and standards. Is it too late to try to establish that stuff?