Seòmar agus comataidhean

Thanks for that. What I am trying to get at, I suppose, is whether Ayrshire College is a bit more pessimistic about the future or whether the other colleges would have come up with similar forecasts and projections if they had embraced similar scenarios. I am trying to burrow in to find the answer to that. You said that Ayrshire College and Glasgow Kelvin College did this work but none of the others did. If the others did a similar level of forecasting, do you think that they would arrive at a similar picture?

The public would see the evidence of how their money is being spent, or will be spent in the coming years—is that what you are saying?

Thank you for your responses.

Okay. That is clear.

Does Ben Edgar-Spier want to come in, convener?

Thank you. The second part of the question is this: how do we demonstrate the benefit? Fiona Campbell said that the levy has to be ring fenced so that it is clearly seen to be beneficial.

Stacey, do you want to come in, or do you want to respond to the previous question?

Good morning to everybody on the panel.

I want to look at the funds that could be raised through the scheme. Stacey Dingwall’s response to an earlier question touched on that. The bill makes it clear that the net proceeds of the scheme should be used for

“developing, supporting or sustaining facilities or services which are substantially for or used by persons visiting the scheme area for leisure purposes.”

Is that the correct approach? It does not specifically mention our business visitors to Scotland. Are they all correctly lumped into the same category? What are the potential on-going benefits that we should expect to see from the levy being deployed locally to develop those services? I will start with Stacey.

Frank, you also said in your earlier answer to one of the committee members that there needs to be more of a long-term plan, rather than an annual budgetary cycle. Will you expand on what you mean by that and on what the benefits of that would be?

Okay. Thanks very much, everybody, for those responses. Back to you, convener.

Okay. Should the record-keeping, reporting and reviewing arrangements that are in the bill assist us by making it clear that the net revenues gained from the levy deliver the services that you are talking about? Stephen Young said that we might never see the benefit. Should it be clearer that the levy and the revenue that is gained from it by an authority is clearly being spent on delivering those services? Fiona Campbell said that we should ring fence it. Is it the view of the witnesses that we should be clearer about how we do that?

Okay. David Weston, did you want to come back in?