Seòmar agus comataidhean

Thanks very much, convener. It is related to the question that Mark Griffin asked. There are about 6.5 million visitors to Glasgow airport and about 11 million visitors into Edinburgh airport. Those visitors do not necessarily stay in Glasgow and Edinburgh, despite the obvious attractions of doing so. People come in there, then go elsewhere. Glasgow and Edinburgh residents, for example, get all the pollution, noise and congestion, but potentially no benefit from visitors who land in those two cities. Do Glasgow and Edinburgh councils have a view on whether we should try to do something to capture that issue within the bill?

Thank you very much.

Yes. I had hoped to ask about the cruise ship levy. The Scottish Government has announced that it intends to include such a levy in the legislation. Are you able to share any experience in that respect from our European friends? Does it work? If so, how? Is it successful or otherwise?

My opening question is for Jamie Baker, from East Lothian Council. In your submission to the committee, you talk about the relative benefits of having a national or a regional scheme. Has East Lothian reached a position on whether it prefers national or local?

Thanks very much for that. I turn to penalties and enforcement. That issue came up in discussion last week and some of our contributors felt that they are perhaps a wee bit on the draconian side and too severe in some cases. Have you any views on the enforcement possibilities and whether they are far too strong?

Thank you for that. Are there any other views on penalties and enforcement?

Thanks very much for that.

Are there other views on national guidance on local implementation and decision making? Does the panel feel that that is the best approach?

Any other views?

Will you just divvy up the funds by five?