The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2547 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Willie Coffey
Okay.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Willie Coffey
The Accounts Commission reported that
“the lack of transparency ... makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions on councils’ planned use of reserves.”
Would you share that view, and would you encourage councils to be a bit clearer about what they plan to do? Reserves are listed in various categories, which we found difficult to follow.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Willie Coffey
Thanks very much, convener. Good morning, everybody.
I will come to the reserves issue in a wee minute, Katie, but first of all, on council debt, you must have heard some of our conversations last week with Professor Heald, who talked about local authority debt being upwards of £1 billion. You must also have heard the conversation about what happened, tragically, to some councils down south, which incurred huge amounts of debt that they have been unable to service. In fact, some have, in effect, declared themselves bankrupt.
There was a discussion about the power of general competence, which English councils have, but Scottish councils do not. I asked a direct question whether local councils in Scotland would like such a power, but not, one would hope, to do the same thing that Woking Borough Council did and end up £2 billion in debt.
Is the debt in Scottish councils generally serviceable? Are you collectively able to service and pay that debt as it arises, presumably from borrowing and so forth?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Willie Coffey
My final question is on reserves. In its most recent joint report with the Accounts Commission, Audit Scotland has said that local councils in Scotland are sitting on £4.5 billion of reserves. First, do you accept that figure as being accurate?
I am sure that you will tell me that the money is all earmarked, allocated, committed and so on and so forth, but the committee has actually found it difficult to cut through and see exactly what is usable, non-usable, committed or uncommitted. The report says:
“the lack of transparency in some councils’ annual accounts makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions on councils planned use”
of all those reserves. Do you agree? We are finding it difficult to understand the picture with reserves and all the different categories. Will you offer a general comment on that, please?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Willie Coffey
That was really helpful. Thank you very much, everybody, for offering those explanations.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Willie Coffey
That is a very helpful answer. Are there circumstances in which the Scottish Government would step in—for example, if it felt that a council was borrowing too much and going beyond the CIPFA guidelines and the prudential framework? Has that ever happened? Do you have the power to do that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Willie Coffey
I turn to the issue of reserves. You might have heard me put to Councillor Hagmann the fact that the Accounts Commission report that said that there is £4.5 billion of reserves sitting with Scotland’s local councils. Councillor Hagmann was very quick to point out that £4 billion of that is already earmarked or committed, leaving £500 million as useable. What is the Scottish Government’s sense of that? Is the figure accurate?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Willie Coffey
Thank you—I appreciate that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Willie Coffey
My questions were alluding to how we encourage more employers to participate in the principle of fair work, which is great, as, I am sure, colleagues agree.
Could I ask a couple of questions more about the survey itself? Do we know whether the questions that led to the results about Scotland’s relative positions were aimed at staff or the employers? How do we know whose perspective we see here in this data?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Willie Coffey
One of the key principles is about respect in the workplace. I am looking at the aggregate table from your report, which is in the papers that we have. It seems to break down respect into two categories: workplace non-fatal injuries and work-related ill health and disease. The key principles talk about things such as wellbeing and dignified treatment. I am curious. How do we measure that? I suggest to you that you can measure that only by asking staff what they think and whether they are treated with respect in their jobs. Is that captured in this data?