The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2425 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Willie Coffey
Thanks very much, convener. Good morning, everybody.
I will come to the reserves issue in a wee minute, Katie, but first of all, on council debt, you must have heard some of our conversations last week with Professor Heald, who talked about local authority debt being upwards of £1 billion. You must also have heard the conversation about what happened, tragically, to some councils down south, which incurred huge amounts of debt that they have been unable to service. In fact, some have, in effect, declared themselves bankrupt.
There was a discussion about the power of general competence, which English councils have, but Scottish councils do not. I asked a direct question whether local councils in Scotland would like such a power, but not, one would hope, to do the same thing that Woking Borough Council did and end up £2 billion in debt.
Is the debt in Scottish councils generally serviceable? Are you collectively able to service and pay that debt as it arises, presumably from borrowing and so forth?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Willie Coffey
My final question is on reserves. In its most recent joint report with the Accounts Commission, Audit Scotland has said that local councils in Scotland are sitting on £4.5 billion of reserves. First, do you accept that figure as being accurate?
I am sure that you will tell me that the money is all earmarked, allocated, committed and so on and so forth, but the committee has actually found it difficult to cut through and see exactly what is usable, non-usable, committed or uncommitted. The report says:
“the lack of transparency in some councils’ annual accounts makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions on councils planned use”
of all those reserves. Do you agree? We are finding it difficult to understand the picture with reserves and all the different categories. Will you offer a general comment on that, please?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Willie Coffey
That was really helpful. Thank you very much, everybody, for offering those explanations.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Willie Coffey
That is a very helpful answer. Are there circumstances in which the Scottish Government would step in—for example, if it felt that a council was borrowing too much and going beyond the CIPFA guidelines and the prudential framework? Has that ever happened? Do you have the power to do that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Willie Coffey
I turn to the issue of reserves. You might have heard me put to Councillor Hagmann the fact that the Accounts Commission report that said that there is £4.5 billion of reserves sitting with Scotland’s local councils. Councillor Hagmann was very quick to point out that £4 billion of that is already earmarked or committed, leaving £500 million as useable. What is the Scottish Government’s sense of that? Is the figure accurate?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 October 2024
Willie Coffey
Thank you—I appreciate that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Willie Coffey
My questions were alluding to how we encourage more employers to participate in the principle of fair work, which is great, as, I am sure, colleagues agree.
Could I ask a couple of questions more about the survey itself? Do we know whether the questions that led to the results about Scotland’s relative positions were aimed at staff or the employers? How do we know whose perspective we see here in this data?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Willie Coffey
One of the key principles is about respect in the workplace. I am looking at the aggregate table from your report, which is in the papers that we have. It seems to break down respect into two categories: workplace non-fatal injuries and work-related ill health and disease. The key principles talk about things such as wellbeing and dignified treatment. I am curious. How do we measure that? I suggest to you that you can measure that only by asking staff what they think and whether they are treated with respect in their jobs. Is that captured in this data?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Willie Coffey
What about the wider position on a public-facing accreditation framework?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2024
Willie Coffey
Good morning. I would like to ask a few questions about the attitudes of employers and staff to the issues that we are discussing.
Firstly, are you getting a sense, or did the researchers get a sense, that Scottish employers are engaging with the principle of fair work much more these days? Is the engagement accelerating? Is there quite broad participation? Did the researchers ask that?
10:45