Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 21 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2425 contributions

|

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 8 October 2024

Willie Coffey

Thanks very much, convener. Good morning, everybody.

I will come to the reserves issue in a wee minute, Katie, but first of all, on council debt, you must have heard some of our conversations last week with Professor Heald, who talked about local authority debt being upwards of £1 billion. You must also have heard the conversation about what happened, tragically, to some councils down south, which incurred huge amounts of debt that they have been unable to service. In fact, some have, in effect, declared themselves bankrupt.

There was a discussion about the power of general competence, which English councils have, but Scottish councils do not. I asked a direct question whether local councils in Scotland would like such a power, but not, one would hope, to do the same thing that Woking Borough Council did and end up £2 billion in debt.

Is the debt in Scottish councils generally serviceable? Are you collectively able to service and pay that debt as it arises, presumably from borrowing and so forth?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 8 October 2024

Willie Coffey

My final question is on reserves. In its most recent joint report with the Accounts Commission, Audit Scotland has said that local councils in Scotland are sitting on £4.5 billion of reserves. First, do you accept that figure as being accurate?

I am sure that you will tell me that the money is all earmarked, allocated, committed and so on and so forth, but the committee has actually found it difficult to cut through and see exactly what is usable, non-usable, committed or uncommitted. The report says:

“the lack of transparency in some councils’ annual accounts makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions on councils planned use”

of all those reserves. Do you agree? We are finding it difficult to understand the picture with reserves and all the different categories. Will you offer a general comment on that, please?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 8 October 2024

Willie Coffey

That was really helpful. Thank you very much, everybody, for offering those explanations.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 8 October 2024

Willie Coffey

That is a very helpful answer. Are there circumstances in which the Scottish Government would step in—for example, if it felt that a council was borrowing too much and going beyond the CIPFA guidelines and the prudential framework? Has that ever happened? Do you have the power to do that?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 8 October 2024

Willie Coffey

I turn to the issue of reserves. You might have heard me put to Councillor Hagmann the fact that the Accounts Commission report that said that there is £4.5 billion of reserves sitting with Scotland’s local councils. Councillor Hagmann was very quick to point out that £4 billion of that is already earmarked or committed, leaving £500 million as useable. What is the Scottish Government’s sense of that? Is the figure accurate?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny 2025-26

Meeting date: 8 October 2024

Willie Coffey

Thank you—I appreciate that.

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Fair Work Convention

Meeting date: 2 October 2024

Willie Coffey

My questions were alluding to how we encourage more employers to participate in the principle of fair work, which is great, as, I am sure, colleagues agree.

Could I ask a couple of questions more about the survey itself? Do we know whether the questions that led to the results about Scotland’s relative positions were aimed at staff or the employers? How do we know whose perspective we see here in this data?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Fair Work Convention

Meeting date: 2 October 2024

Willie Coffey

One of the key principles is about respect in the workplace. I am looking at the aggregate table from your report, which is in the papers that we have. It seems to break down respect into two categories: workplace non-fatal injuries and work-related ill health and disease. The key principles talk about things such as wellbeing and dignified treatment. I am curious. How do we measure that? I suggest to you that you can measure that only by asking staff what they think and whether they are treated with respect in their jobs. Is that captured in this data?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Fair Work Convention

Meeting date: 2 October 2024

Willie Coffey

What about the wider position on a public-facing accreditation framework?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Fair Work Convention

Meeting date: 2 October 2024

Willie Coffey

Good morning. I would like to ask a few questions about the attitudes of employers and staff to the issues that we are discussing.

Firstly, are you getting a sense, or did the researchers get a sense, that Scottish employers are engaging with the principle of fair work much more these days? Is the engagement accelerating? Is there quite broad participation? Did the researchers ask that?

10:45