The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2547 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Thank you. The next question is for both of you. Should councils have some power to set the multipliers between the bands? Should that be a local decision that councils can take? What risks might be associated with that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Thank you, David. Emma, do you want councils to have such powers?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Ken, do you want to enter this battle of the bands?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Does revaluation mean that the system becomes more progressive, in your opinion?
10:15Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Thank you very much, both of you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Good morning. The Ayrshire growth deal’s annual report that was issued in November shows that there has been a drawdown of only 8 per cent so far on both Governments’ commitments. Of that 8 per cent, 70 per cent is for one project. Does the Scottish Government consider that to be good progress, five years into the programme?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Willie Coffey
My final question is on AI. You mentioned the AI National Robotarium project in Edinburgh, which is a growth deal project. Allied to that is the exascale computer project, which was not part of the growth deal but is closely aligned to the whole project concept in Edinburgh. We also asked the Secretary of State for Scotland about that three weeks ago. Everyone’s understanding was that that investment was earmarked for Edinburgh, but he told us that, when his Government came into office, there was “no money” behind that project whatsoever. We are talking about £900 million of investment for that supercomputer in Edinburgh.
However, the secretary of state did not tell us that the project has been shifted to Oxford. In the past three weeks, we have discovered that the supercomputer is being built but that it is being built in Oxford. Last week, it was announced that there would be about £78 billion of investment in the Oxford to Cambridge growth corridor, and I presume that that investment will encompass funding for the exascale computer. Have Edinburgh and Scotland been short-changed by those decisions?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Willie Coffey
The convener talked about different models of providing money to areas in the UK. Is the £78 billion of investment, in effect, a new growth deal, but for the Oxford to Cambridge corridor?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Willie Coffey
Thank you. The project list shows 18 projects in the Ayrshire growth deal. Two of them, we know, have been dropped. There are another 10 that have not drawn down a single penny in five years. That is more than just a problem of two projects having to be dropped; that suggests to me that there is a wider problem.
This is one of the few opportunities that a parliamentary committee gets to scrutinise the growth deals. As you know, we do not have a formal scrutiny role—we are not part of the partnership boards and so on. Do you think that we need to revisit what the scrutiny picture looks like, to give the Parliament, its committees and its members an opportunity to have some involvement in and oversight of progress?