The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2127 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Willie Coffey
The Scottish Federation of Housing Associations recommended that we need proper guidance on surveys and so on for domestic properties. We have such guidance for non-domestic properties. Does the panel agree with the SFHA? Do we need to extend the scope of guidance to deal with RAAC?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Sean mentioned Dundee and Aberdeen. Would the guidance that is applicable to, say, Dundee work for Glasgow, or does it have to be guidance for individual areas?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Willie Coffey
I agree with colleagues. The Housing (Scotland) Bill is an opportunity to implement the changes that the petitioner seeks. I ask colleagues to agree to close the petition.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Willie Coffey
The Government’s position on the petition seems to be clear enough: a diminishing number of tenancies is affected by the measure. As a result, I agree with the Government’s view that it is really not worth our while to progress the petition any further.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 March 2025
Willie Coffey
The petition, which was lodged in the Parliament in 2021, simply calls on the Government to urgently provide additional revenue to local councils to run such services. We could argue that the call has been superseded by revenue awards to local authorities since that date, particularly in the coming year.
I am pretty sure that members will agree that the matters that are raised in the petition are very much of interest to the committee. However, I feel that it is appropriate for the committee to close the petition and take on board the petitioner’s message that there are wider issues, which the committee might wish to explore.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Great—that is good.
Cabinet secretary, you have probably seen the evidence that we took from our Welsh colleagues last week. We heard that one of their main motivations has been to put fairness at the heart of their council tax system. They have managed to progress with that and deliver changes, which we havnae managed to do in Scotland. Why do you think that is?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Willie Coffey
You mentioned banding systems. The Welsh added another band—band I. We made a valiant attempt to adjust the multipliers on the upper four bands. Do you still see a banding system as being the cornerstone and at the heart of the process, or is that up for debate and discussion?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Turning to revaluation and whether it can be a tool to make the system fairer, the Scottish Government’s “Framework for Tax” document, which came out in 2021, had the broad principle that
“Taxes should be levied in proportion to taxpayers’ ability to pay.”
We know that, but does the Government still ascribe to trying to embed that vision at the heart of any new system, and how can we use the tool of revaluation to deliver that fairness?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Councillor Hagmann, if all we get out of this is a revaluation process, would that be worth while?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Good morning, cabinet secretary, Councillor Hagmann and colleagues. I first want to ask Councillor Hagmann about the convention that is planned for March. It would be fair to say that our committee thinks that the best that we can possibly achieve is some kind of agreement on broad principles to take us forward, and you mentioned that that might be the purpose of the convention in March. Has that been rolled out to all the participating political parties to get them to think about what consensus might look like so that we can move forward?