The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2544 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Willie Coffey
Finally, I have a question about the fairness of the whole idea behind the policy. Is it fair to apply it to second-home owners in particular, who might have paid extra through land and buildings transaction tax, for example? Is there a fairness debate to be had on the second-home element? Emma, could you offer a view on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Willie Coffey
Sharon, what is your view? You might have heard Anna Gardiner on the previous panel pleading for a discretionary element for local authorities. She cited quite a number of circumstances in the rural setting that gave committee members an insight into the reasons why houses can be empty for long periods. Do you think that there is a need for a discretionary element that councils can apply when considering all the circumstances?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Willie Coffey
Mike, a view from COSLA on this issue would be really welcome.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Willie Coffey
Many thanks to you all.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Willie Coffey
Good morning. I want to continue the chat about empty properties, and I will perhaps start with Anna Gardiner. I have a number of urban properties in my constituency that have been empty for ages. Despite the best efforts of a number of people, we do not seem to be able to get any response from the owners to our encouragement to do something to bring the properties back into use. Do you think that the higher council tax premium will make things worse or better with regard to those more urban properties that we could probably do with bringing back into the stock?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Willie Coffey
I was going to ask whether you are advocating for a discretionary element before the premiums can be applied, so that local authorities can decide on a case-by-case basis whether to apply them. Is that your position?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Willie Coffey
Sharon or Mike, do you have a view on fairness with regard to second homes? Anything from you, Mike? Is the policy fair?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Willie Coffey
Minister, I was just—
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Willie Coffey
Are there any exclusions in the agreement? I am thinking about businesses such as those involving digital, artificial intelligence and call centres. I think that we are already at a significant disadvantage there, with quite a lot of that business being driven and sourced in India and serving a UK customer base. Do you have any details on that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Willie Coffey
Is there a risk that, under the agreement, Scotland might lose more of these digital services to offshore suppliers?