The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2127 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Thank you, again, Shona.
I will turn to Emma Saunders, briefly. Your submission told of the need for impartial independent expertise, advice and reports about the issues, because tenants might not always trust reports by the landlord on the condition of a house. Could you explain to the committee why you think that that is important?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Are there any other views from the panel on the idea of having some kind of front-end assessment of a property’s condition?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Are there any other comments on that?
10:00Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Good morning to everybody on the panel.
Thinking about the examples that people have cited just now and in previous years, is it your experience that the damp and mould are already there when people get the tenancy and do not occur after they take up the tenancy? My experience over the years, as a councillor and in the Parliament, is that the damp and mould are there in the first place. Should there be a system that assesses the fitness of the property initially, at the letting stage, in which the landlord—whoever it is—declares that the house is fit for purpose and does not have damp and mould? All the problems that we are dealing with today are there when a tenant begins living in a property.
Thinking about the example that Sean Clerkin gave of a person having lived in the property for 14 years, I would bet that the damp and mould were there in the beginning, before that person got the house. Do you think that we should look at the front end of the process and correctly assess the condition of a house at that point, to make sure that it can be let?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Thank you, convener. Good morning to you both.
I want to ask you about trust. Who can tenants who live in a house that suffers from dampness and mould trust? My experience as an elected member is littered with examples of council officials turning up and blaming tenants an their lifestyle for being the principal cause of dampness and mould in the house. That has been going on for years.
You might have heard a wee bit of the discussion with the previous witnesses about who we can trust to tell us the truth about the condition of a house. Do you have a view on that? Who should that be? Should there be an independent panel of experts, as has been mentioned, so that tenants can understand what is being said to them and can trust what is being said about repairs to their houses?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Many thanks for that. I realise that I am probably encroaching on my colleagues’ questions, which will give you a chance to develop that theme.
I would like to get a sense of what the other witnesses think. Do we need to do something at the front end of the letting process of a tenancy, so that tenants can be assured that the house they get does not have damp and mould present? Would that be a good idea?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Thanks, convener. Building maintenance has been an issue for years. Suddenly, we discover that there is RAAC and there is a problem to be addressed. Have we collectively taken our eye off the ball with that issue? Scotland is a wet country. It rains 200 days a year, so it should not come as a surprise that the buildings get wet from time to time. Why should it have come as a surprise that we get these issues with RAAC? Should we have been closely examining it regularly and looking at maintenance issues? Who should have done it? Should building owners and landlords have done it? Should they continue to do it in the future?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Would standard guidance cover that? If the issues are variable wherever we see RAAC, would standard guidance work?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Who should do that kind of assessment?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 March 2025
Willie Coffey
Gloria, how do we establish public trust so that people can be assured that what they are being told about the condition of their house is correct and accurate?