Seòmar agus comataidhean

We are always concerned that people who are not in the digital arena can still participate and that they do not feel that there is a barrier. We will have to see how that progresses.

I have other questions about the technology assurance framework that Colin Beattie asked about. Dharshi Santhakumaran said that the latest review gave the project amber/green status. What are the amber parts of that? Do we have any concerns?

Finally, I turn to the IT side. Members have talked about that aspect, and it has come before the committee a number of times over the years. Are you satisfied that NRS has the required skills, experience and leadership in IT to enable the project to be successfully delivered?

I have a couple of questions. The first one continues the discussion on the impact on rural communities, and the second will be on costs that are likely to come up.

What impacts would the proposed legislation have on, for example, a small rural business in south-west Scotland or the Highlands, compared with a business in the city of Edinburgh? Should the proposed licensing scheme apply in both locations and circumstances? Maybe David Weston and Amanda Cupples could respond to that first.

Our witnesses have raised the issue of cost several times. The information that we have in front of us indicates a cost of between £200 and £400 for a three-year licence, but Fiona Campbell said that it could be much higher. If we believe the figures that we have, the cost would work out at roughly £1.30 to £2.60 per week. Why do you believe that it would be much higher than that? What discussions have you had, if any, with the local authorities that would have discretion to introduce the fee?

Do any of the other witnesses have comments on the licensing fee issue that Fiona Campbell has not made?

What is the position now? Has the commission said to the Government that the legislation is perhaps not fit for purpose?

I will finish by following up on the questions that Richard Leonard asked about the improvement plan and looking to the future.

There have been several mentions of the recommendations and the fact that 33 out of 41 recommendations have been achieved. Who agrees that those have been achieved?

I have a final question. Will Deloitte conduct a follow-up audit to check whether it agrees that the recommendations have been completed satisfactorily?

Good morning to everyone on the panel. Given where we are, it is probably too early to gaze ahead beyond the pandemic, but I invite Mary Morgan and Caroline Lamb to say a few words about the remobilisation plan that they have been asked to work on.

Mary, in your opening remarks, you gave us some great examples of the achievements that we have seen, and you particularly mentioned the digital aspect, such as the use of Teams. As part of the remobilisation plan and getting back to business as usual, will we retain some of those good elements of practice which, although they were forced on us, have turned out to be very advantageous for the way in which we and your staff work? Could you give us a flavour of how you see that going ahead? Will we retain the best of what came out as a result of Covid?

That is pretty amazing, actually. The technology worked with 900 people online at the same time, did it?