Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 22 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2133 contributions

|

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Pre-Budget Scrutiny 2023-24

Meeting date: 27 September 2022

Willie Coffey

Thank you. Does the Scottish Government have any views on the UK Government’s Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill and, in particular, its various missions that relate to housing, which is, of course, a devolved responsibility? Has there been any consultation of the Scottish Government on any aspect of that? Has the UK Government signalled its intention to fund any of those policy intentions?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Pre-Budget Scrutiny 2023-24

Meeting date: 27 September 2022

Willie Coffey

I am glad to hear that, cabinet secretary. Back to you, convener.

Public Audit Committee

“Scotland’s colleges 2022”

Meeting date: 22 September 2022

Willie Coffey

We all agree that the digital platforms that were available were a huge boost to everyone in the sector, particularly the students. Why was there such a fall-off in completion rates if remote learning was embedded and working successfully? Were there other factors behind it?

Public Audit Committee

“Scotland’s colleges 2022”

Meeting date: 22 September 2022

Willie Coffey

Do you think that colleges will keep the door open to continuing to deploy in an online environment? Those are important lessons for us to learn. It is a big worry that, because of issues with inclusion and exclusion, students are not able to exploit the digital world, which will inevitably mean that more students might leave or that there will be more demand from them to return to college to complete their course. We do not know which way things will go, but do you think that colleges will keep their doors open to the online world and retain the best of it?

Public Audit Committee

“Scotland’s colleges 2022”

Meeting date: 22 September 2022

Willie Coffey

Good morning, everyone. One of the few good things that emerged from Covid was how quickly the colleges, particularly Ayrshire College—I have to mention it—adapted to the circumstances in which they found themselves. It is a credit to the staff and students how quickly they responded and adapted to the new online world in which they lived. It was almost sprung on us overnight. There are some fantastic examples of that and you mention a couple of them in your briefing, Auditor General, but you also talked about the equalities impact, which Sharon Dowey mentioned, too.

Will you tell us a little about the experience with online learning? Will you tell us about the positive way that the colleges embraced the online world and the ways that they tried to address the clear impact that it was having in making inequalities even worse?

Public Audit Committee

“Scotland’s colleges 2022”

Meeting date: 22 September 2022

Willie Coffey

My final point is a follow-up to Sharon Dowey’s question. There is bound to be a knock-on effect on the skills pool that is available to us if more students head for university and fewer complete their college course. Throughout the Covid pandemic, we heard that there were still opportunities in certain sectors that were struggling to recruit. For example, the hospitality sector had a huge problem with recruitment. That problem actually predated Covid, but it got worse during it. Are we looking at a skills issue that should worry us, and what would your advice be to the sector to try to address it?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 8 September 2022

Willie Coffey

The key component that is perhaps missing in the process is possibly the ability of the yard to deliver the ships. We all know that hindsight is a wonderful thing, but why would there not be in that process some kind of assessment of the yard’s ability to complete the vessels on time and on budget? That is what has happened since. Where was the assurance about the yard’s ability to complete them? Where was that in the process?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 8 September 2022

Willie Coffey

I ask you to clarify that all the key players in the process were content—perhaps not happy, but content—that the risks with which we were presented were manageable. At that stage, everyone was content to make a recommendation to proceed. Is that correct?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 8 September 2022

Willie Coffey

Can you think of any additional process of assurance that could have taken place that might have helped us to avoid getting to where we are today? What could we possibly have done at that time to try to avoid the circumstances that we find ourselves in?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report: “New vessels for the Clyde and Hebrides: Arrangements to deliver vessels 801 and 802”

Meeting date: 8 September 2022

Willie Coffey

Good morning, Mr Middleton. I will ask a few questions about that area as well.

Up to the point where the approval was given, there was clearly concern about the contracts, and it did not lead to anyone asking for written authority or ministerial direction, so there must have been some kind of assurance process that enabled you to recommend to ministers that they proceed with the contract. That seems to be missing for members of the committee and the public. What happened to take us from concerns to feeling able to recommend proceeding with the contract? What did the assurance process that enabled that advice to be given to the minister look like?