Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 22 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2133 contributions

|

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 29 November 2022

Willie Coffey

Okay. Thank you for that.

In response to one of the questions, you mentioned community wealth building. There was some evidence given to the committee that the definition of that in NPF4 is a little bit lacking in clarity, and perhaps it is not so well understood in planning circles, even now. Can you say a wee bit more about how you might address that and whether you agree with the concerns and issues that have been raised in order to make it clearer for everyone?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 29 November 2022

Willie Coffey

Thank you very much for that. I hope that I can come back in later, convener.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 22 November 2022

Willie Coffey

That is the very issue that I find difficult. An old building in a town such as Kilmarnock, for example, will have had several purposes over many years. There might be an application to use it for some new purpose or other that elected members or the citizens of the town collectively do not agree with. Planners feel impeded in changing their mind if a particular change of use has already been provided for. How do we inject into NPF4 a sense that people might think differently about what a town should be and what a building should be used for? I do not see that in NFP4 and, having discussed those issues with local planners, I do not think that they feel that they have the ability to do that. Therefore, who should do it? Should it be Professor Hague’s proposed citizen stakeholder group pushing from the bottom up, or should it be some other mechanism? That is what I am trying to get to.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 22 November 2022

Willie Coffey (Kilmarnock and Irvine Valley) (SNP)

You both mentioned the local development plans. Is there a pressing urgency for local planning authorities to review their LDPs, particularly when the new NPF4 might include references that are perhaps not contained in their current LDPs? Do the planning authorities need to revise and review those as soon as they can?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 22 November 2022

Willie Coffey

Thank you. Robbie, do you have anything to add?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 22 November 2022

Willie Coffey

It was on local development plans. Is there a pressing urgency for the planning authorities to revise those plans to get them into fit enough local shape? There are provisions in the new NPF4 that will impact on the local development plans.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 22 November 2022

Willie Coffey

Thank you. I love that phrase “souls on fire”. We need many more of them locally and across Scotland.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Planning Framework 4

Meeting date: 22 November 2022

Willie Coffey

Good morning. I am glad that the witnesses have widened out the discussion. I was hopeful that some of the issues that concern me as a local member and have done for many years would be solved in NPF4, and I would like to get your views on whether they are.

Professor Hague talked about things such as derelict buildings, empty shops and offshore retail owners, and the inability to reach out to those bits of society to get them to play their part. I very much hoped that NPF4 would enable us to deal with some of that. If you look around any city, town or village in Scotland, you will see examples all over the place of urban dereliction and decay, abandoned shops, abandoned land, absentee owners and absentee shareholders, whoever they may be.

I thought to myself, “What is the role for NPF4 in addressing that big issue, because it is what matters to the citizens in my constituency?” Professor Hague talked about perhaps having citizen stakeholders to get a bottom-up approach and solution to the issue. Was it too much to expect NPF4 to address that? What could we do additionally to help NPF4 to deal with that problem in the urban setting?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 15 November 2022

Willie Coffey

Jane Fowler, do you have anything to add?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

National Care Service (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 15 November 2022

Willie Coffey

That brings me to my final question on the matter, which is about consistency. You might have heard me asking the previous panel of witnesses how we get a consistent approach right across Scotland without a national approach. I do not think that they were totally clear in what their views were on that. I am really concerned about it, and I appreciate that it is at the heart of the bill. How do we ensure that we get a nationally consistent level of quality in services but retain the existing services—you mentioned East Ayrshire—that are already delivering a first-class service? How do we ensure that we do both?