The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2133 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Okay. Thank you.
11:00Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Does the fact that you did not apply those techniques compromise the data and the message that it gives?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Willie Coffey
I note from the response rate table in the report that the response rate of a lot of the bigger authorities was well below the average response rate. The response rates of Glasgow City Council, the City of Edinburgh Council, South Lanarkshire Council and North Lanarkshire Council are well below the average. Does that tell us something about the quality of the message? Does it say that the survey is not really representative of the broad scope of candidates who stood at the election?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Willie Coffey
When you get it.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 6 December 2022
Willie Coffey
I am sorry—it must be me, but I am still no clearer.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Okay, that clarifies that. It is a small drop in the ocean, but we are looking for any good news in this briefing.
You mentioned the fiscal framework levers in the report. They were not really designed for this scenario or the current circumstances; they were meant just to adjust for volatility here and there. What is your impression of the fiscal framework levers? Are they adequate to cover the situation in which we find ourselves? Should there be a revision or reconsideration of what the levers do?
09:45Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Paragraph 15 sets out that the comprehensive spending review projected a 3.3 per cent real-terms growth in budgets, but the figure is now expected to be 1.9 per cent. Is that a further expectation of a diminishment, as you put it, of the budget? That is on top of the other issue, is it not? Have you estimated what the value of that might be?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Okay. Thank you very much for that.
Lastly, you mentioned a number of possible levers that might provide us with flexibility. You talked about use or otherwise of reserves. You talk in your paper about capital borrowing powers, and you mentioned flexibility in relation to ring-fenced funding and so on. Can you give us a flavour of whether those can be realistically deployed, varied or whatever, to help us through the situation that we are in?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2022
Willie Coffey
I seek clarification on exhibit 2, which you mentioned earlier. There is an orange section that shows £193 million of increased income. I can see no detail surrounding that. What is that, and where has it come from?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Auditor General, I draw your attention to paragraphs 13 to 15 of your report. In your opening remarks, you described the budget as “inflation-diminished”. Can you put a figure on that? The First Minister put a figure of £1.7 billion on it, as you mention in paragraph 14. Are you broadly in agreement with that?