The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2133 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 13 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Thanks very much for that, everybody—it was very helpful.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
The load testing did not pick up that the system might think that there was a cyberattack, but when the system went live in real time, it did.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Good morning, panel.
I want to start with Geoff Huggins, if I may. In your letter to the committee, Geoff, you mention some pilot projects looking at the spend control process in two areas, namely the Scottish Government’s payment service and telephony services, and you have highlighted a number of issues that have arisen in that respect. Can you tell us a wee bit more about the outcome of that work? My attention was drawn to the part of your submission where you say:
“On the basis of the pilot work … we are developing new thinking on how to secure greater value and improved outcomes in respect of digital delivery.”
Can you give us a wee glimpse of what you mean by that? What were the actual outcomes of that process?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
You said that one of the lessons that you have learned is that such an approach could probably not be applied to all project work. I guess that you mean that getting that kind of information, which could then be applied across the board, would require too much investment, but would not applying the same rigour across the board give rise to any risks that you might be worried about?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Ultimately, though, it is the DAO that assesses the effectiveness of the process. Is it measured by results—that is, projects getting through to completion without being stopped or projects not going over budget or overrunning schedules? Is that how you measure the effectiveness of your processes?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Many thanks for that response. That was a positive note to end on.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you very much, convener.
On the issue that Sharon Dowey has just raised, it seems from the explanation that no load testing of the system was carried out in advance. It is clear that that would and should have identified that the system would think that there was a cyberattack. Why was that not done in advance?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Okay. Thanks for that.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
The submission says that the digital assurance office was established in 2019, but I also note that that was the last year in which a project was stopped for any reason. Has your experience since then benefited you by allowing you to identify as early as possible whether a project should or should not go forward? Are you saying that, since the DAO developed this process, every piece of work that has been undertaken has successfully gone through the various stages to completion?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2022
Willie Coffey
Thank you for that.
It is the digital assurance framework itself that gives rise to my next question. How do we make sure that we have the right people and the right balance to review a particular piece of work? Perhaps that is a question for Sharon Fairweather. Looking at the organogram that you have submitted in your letter, Sharon, I find the set of structures with regard to officers and responsibilities fairly complex. What does it mean in practice? Moreover, given what Geoff Huggins has just said, how do you choose which skills to deploy in particular reviews that you undertake?