The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2133 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Willie Coffey
That is helpful, Blyth.
You mentioned reserves, which brings me to my next question. The picture on reserves is varied. Bill Moyes, I think that you said that two thirds of councils plan to use reserves, which suggests that a third are not planning to use them. Is there guidance about the use of reserves and a reasonable level of deployment? Do councils broadly follow that advice and guidance? A third have decided not to deploy reserves and are perhaps looking to make cuts to bridge the gap.
09:45Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Willie Coffey
I imagine that there is guidance about it. I am sure that a council would not be legally permitted to deploy all its reserves in one year. Is there guidance on that? I presume that, by and large, councils follow such guidance.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Willie Coffey
Robert, what is the picture in Dundee in relation to reserves?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Willie Coffey
Good morning. I will invite you to dive into the ring-fencing swimming pool and offer some perspectives on the discussion that we had earlier. You might have heard Bill Moyes say that the Accounts Commission estimates that about 23 per cent is ring fenced while COSLA says that it is about 60 per cent and the Scottish Government that it is about 7 per cent. What is your perspective on those figures? Will you offer the committee an explanation of how you have arrived there?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Willie Coffey
Thanks, Martin. Kirsty and Robert, do you have perspectives on the figures and why they vary?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 31 January 2023
Willie Coffey
Are you one of the two thirds of councils that will be dipping into some reserves, Martin?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Willie Coffey
Would you similarly recommend that that approach be adopted in spending the levelling up money?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Willie Coffey
Okay. Thanks.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Willie Coffey
The education underspend that was discussed a moment ago represents almost a third of the entire underspend, but, as it turns out, it is not real money; it is a technical adjustment. Mr Oliphant gave the figure of, I think, £674 million. Why is that so high? That is a huge technical adjustment, is it not?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Willie Coffey
My question is about the section in the report on the European structural funds and their replacement. Last night, some wonderful news was announced in the media about some of the initial projects in the levelling up funds, totalling £177 million. Very welcome as that is, in this Parliament and this committee, we pride ourselves on the rigour of the scrutiny, governance and accountability that applies to those processes. Where do you see those functions in that process of replacing the European structural funds with the levelling up funds? Where is that rigour, scrutiny and accountability taking place?