The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2133 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Willie Coffey
Do you know whether the UK Government is doing any equivalent work in that area? I talked about building MOTs. I think that we used that phrase at a previous committee meeting to try to articulate the process better for purchasers. Does that concept make sense? Do you know whether the UK Government is going down the route of trying to provide greater reassurance to buyers that their house is fit for purpose in regard to the issues that I mentioned?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Willie Coffey
Good morning to you all. I have some questions on building standards in general but, first, do you think that the changes to the building standards that were introduced last year deliver higher levels of fire safety? What evidence can we draw on as a committee to demonstrate that? I will start with Calum.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Willie Coffey
I should say to Calum McQueen that I was going to come to John-Paul Breslin anyway, but I thought that I would give him a chance first.
Is the Wallace monument not over 18m?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Willie Coffey
Do you see there being a kind of checklist of things that should be there—almost like an MOT certificate of construction compliance? We are all laypersons when we buy a house. If I was buying a new house, I would not know whether there was sound insulation, so we rely on the professionals to tell us that a set of things is required and for that to be signed off, in a sense. Do we have that kind of system yet?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Willie Coffey
Nigel Sellars, do you have anything to offer in that regard? I realise that I have not come to you yet.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Willie Coffey
That is a great point. A number of issues were raised with the committee when we looked at this previously, as well as with me in my role as a constituency member. I will just share an example with you and ask for your opinion on it.
A retired person bought a flat and subsequently wanted to sell that flat, only to discover that it had no fire safety measures and no sound insulation. They are now having incredible difficulty, as you might imagine, in trying to sell it. There is a debate about where the responsibility falls—there is the builder’s responsibility and then, of course, there is the responsibility of the local authority to inspect, and so on. It is in that territory. Whose responsibility is it to assure a person who is about to buy a house that it is fit for purpose, especially in relation to fire safety and other measures such as sound insulation?
I was going to come to you anyway on that point, John-Paul, to see whether you could assist with that type of inquiry.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Willie Coffey
Is the process thorough enough to find deficiencies that are as serious as those that I mentioned? In that particular case, it clearly was not thorough enough, so I wonder whether the new standards that we have introduced will give people the assurance that that kind of thing cannot happen in the future—particularly for fire safety but also for other matters that I have mentioned. Has the process improved? Could that circumstance happen again?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Willie Coffey
Do you recognise that that is a potential issue even going forward now? When people buy a house, one of their principal concerns must be whether it is fire safe. Somebody should tell them whether it is, and they should be able to see that in documentary evidence, without opening up cavities and having a look. Surely, that should be recorded somewhere to give people the assurance that the house that they are about to buy complies with all those requirements. Do people get that as purchasers or does it happen through the survey process?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Willie Coffey
Therein lies the problem. The builder who constructed the house subsequently went out of business and could not perform any remediation. The owner is left with the house and unable to sell it. I am trying to get at whether we have improved those circumstances for the public in Scotland who are buying and selling houses.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Willie Coffey
Thank you, everybody, for your contributions.