The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2127 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Willie Coffey
You talked about the 32 councils. I want to pin you down on that. Does Reform Scotland think that the number should be higher or lower? How do we get the transformational change that you are talking about? Can we get it in that 32-council structure, or is fundamental change needed to deliver it?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Willie Coffey
So was that an argument for 19, then?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Willie Coffey
My last question is an important one, which is about what is called service rationing. Are you seeing any evidence of that? By that, I mean things such as unmet demand increasing or eligibility criteria to get certain services being changed because of the budget situation. Are you seeing any evidence of that or of budgets being shifted to push them towards other priorities?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Willie Coffey
What about the resource spending review? Does that help or hinder?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Willie Coffey
That is fascinating. How locally should power be devolved? Take my constituency of Kilmarnock and Irvine Valley, where there are something like 16 towns or villages, including Kilmarnock. None of those towns or villages has any powers whatsoever. Should it go to that level? The only structure that I can think of is the community councils, which basically represent small towns and villages but have very little power. Are you talking about an agenda that breathes new life into that and gives new power at the town and village level?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 13 June 2023
Willie Coffey
You would also like there to be more detail in the spending review, to provide a bit more clarity. Should we expect to see that as evidence that your recommendations have been carried forward?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2023
Willie Coffey
Will others examine the issue of whether that had a negative impact on the system?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2023
Willie Coffey
Thank you very much. Convener, I hope to come back in later.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2023
Willie Coffey
I was discussing the report with the procurator fiscal in Kilmarnock last week, and she was talking about the presentation of digital evidence, which has led to early disclosure of evidence and seemed to turn the backlog around pretty quickly. It has always been possible to do that, but Covid made us do things that we had not considered possible before, and that seems to have been a particularly successful thing to do. I wonder whether that process will continue to be embedded at the heart of the system to further reduce the backlog.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2023
Willie Coffey
Stephen Boyle, in the report, you referred to the remote jury centre model. There was an initial pilot scheme, which was extended, and it cost £12 million to service the model. There is the usual Public Audit Committee question about value for money around that particular initiative. Have you been able to assess that?