The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2547 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Willie Coffey
Hi folks. I am Willie Coffey. I am the MSP for Kilmarnock and Irvine Valley and the deputy convener of the committee.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 26 March 2024
Willie Coffey
Matthew Brown, do you have an interesting experience to share on this issue?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Willie Coffey
Donald, did your organisation know that that type of expenditure had to be approved by the Scottish Government? After all, it was more than £20,000.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Willie Coffey
Thank you.
My last question on this is for Roy Brannen. As you know, the committee has over the years engaged on sponsorship issues with regard to the sponsor team, its relationships with public bodies and so on. This hardly stands out as a great example of a successful relationship in that respect, and there are issues that we have come up against time and again. What would you say to the committee and to the public about the nature of that relationship, particularly between you and the body in question? What lessons are being learned about how things have to improve in the future, so that we as an audit committee are not continuing to pick out these problems year after year?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Willie Coffey
On performance, I spoke to NHS Ayrshire and Arran’s chief executive only last week about the specific 31-day target for cancer treatment. She said that the board continues to meet the 95 per cent level, and that it actually reached 100 per cent in November. I do not know whether there is a little discrepancy in the data-gathering period for your report, Auditor General, but that was what she clearly said to me last week.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Willie Coffey
You cover delayed discharge in the report and you talk about the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde model, which is called GLASFlow. Can you give the committee a wee glimpse of what that means and whether it is having an impact by reducing our problem of delayed discharge?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Willie Coffey
Related to that issue, the chief executive of NHS Ayrshire and Arran said that one of the issues that affects discharge, interestingly enough, is power of attorney and families being able to grant and get that power. She said that that affects more than half of their discharge cases. Is that common throughout Scotland, and should we highlight that much more in order to encourage the public to embrace use of power of attorney?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Willie Coffey
On staffing and demand versus the ability to staff to meet demand, you mentioned clear difficulties. What more can we and the Government do to try to close that gap? We know that demand is increasing year on year, but we have difficulty in getting the right numbers of staff in health and social care to meet that demand. What are your recommendations for the Government on how it could help?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Willie Coffey
Do you find that patients are receptive to using digital technology if they think that it might let them be seen or heard a little quicker? Are they quite open to that, or would they still prefer a direct face-to-face model?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Willie Coffey
Thank you, convener, and good morning, colleagues.
This meeting is not particularly pleasant. I have been a member of the Parliament—and of the Public Audit Committee, on and off—for 17 years now, and I have to be honest with you and say that this is one of the worst sessions that I have ever participated in.
I have a few questions that I would like to ask Mr Rathjen. On whether the expense was retrospectively approved, you said that, ultimately, it did not make a difference, because it had already been incurred. Why would you do that? Why would you not state your case and say that it was unapproved? You cannot approve something that is clearly not approvable, if you understand my meaning. Why did you not do that? Ultimately, the public would like to know what the difference is between approving something and not approving it. If there is no difference in outcome, what is the point?