The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1216 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I add my thanks to the individuals who wrote in and to all the constituents and other folk who have contacted me personally in my role as a constituency member. I have had representations from people with differing views. All of that is really helpful as we look through the evidence and make a decision on what is a really important matter. Thanks to them all.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Earlier, Brian Taylor touched briefly on post-legislative scrutiny. Can you give us your thoughts on how some of what Audit Scotland has learned might help the Parliament in that respect?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
One question is whether, if the committees of the Scottish Parliament were to do more of that, there would be a concern about witness fatigue. You would be going back to people who were involved as you went through the legislation; there might be a concern about going back to them. Do you have any thoughts on that, Meg?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I have been hoping that someone would raise the matter of directly elected chairs—you almost did earlier, Sir David. We are talking about how the committees get increased self-confidence and higher levels of esteem, potentially paired with financial payment for convenerships. Currently, our conveners do hugely hard work and get no financial reward for it. Do those two things, which happen at Westminster, help the committee structures to have that increased esteem in the eyes of the public and the media?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Thanks very much for that. It was really helpful.
The last area that I will focus on is the impact of scrutiny and audit work, which we have touched on a couple of times. Gemma Diamond, to start the discussion on audit scrutiny, will you give us Audit Scotland’s experience of evaluation work?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I have a quick follow-up on one of the answers that was given to Maggie Chapman.
Tricia, when you were asked about red flags, you said that cybersecurity, finances and student numbers were all red flags. When did student numbers become a red flag?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Was that the first time that student numbers became a red flag?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Were you happy with that significant aspect? You were being told that a reduction in income was expected—a reduction that turned out to be even worse because some of the decisions about where to take international students from were riskier than those taken by other universities. Did it not seem unusual not to have that person at the court?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I am not a member of the committee, but I think that it will be keen to see the workings.
It is really important that the independent investigation is genuinely independent. You have said in your answers that it is not for you to say who should be on the list. I get that, but the list of folk should be extensive and it should include all the senior executives. Some names have been mentioned. I am sure that Baroness Alexander and Lord Robertson will have something to contribute. A lot of folk who are in senior management are not here—some are still involved, and some are not. I am not pointing any fingers, by the way, but we need to have a full understanding of how the university has got to where it is.
I hope that the committee will have sight of the inquiry’s terms of reference so that it can be confident that the inquiry will genuinely look at the things that our constituents are concerned about and give an independent assessment so that the university does not get into such a position again. That will be crucial to getting to a point where we continue to have a world-leading research and academic institution in my home city, which is so important to everyone.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
We would appreciate the workings and how you got to those figures. Those are big numbers that are being bandied around.