The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1217 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I get why you think that there should be a specific cross-party group for a given country. One of my concerns would be cross-party groups on countries being seen as, in effect, an arm of a Government. I see that, within your purposes, you do not talk about the French Government itself; instead, you talk about
“the Assemblée nationale and Sénat”.
That feels appropriate, but what protections are there to ensure that this is about cultural and political issues, and not about Government as such?
10:45Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
The committee is also doing some work in the area, so your comments are helpful in that regard.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Maybe we will ask you to come back. Thanks very much.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I am satisfied with Daniel Johnson’s responses. There is an on-going inquiry to look in the round at cross-party groups. However, I do not think that we should apply future rules to this application, so I agree to the cross-party group being formed.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I will ask about complaints in the round. There was a significant reduction specifically in MSP complaints in this reporting period. There were 98 MSP complaints in this reporting period, compared to 572 in 2022-23. Can you say anything about why that reduction has come about?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Would you say that the figures are now generally stable?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Is there any suggestion that election cycles and those kinds of things increase the number of complaints that you receive and have to deal with?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Bearing in mind that all three witnesses in today’s session have said that they fundamentally do not support the bill, they might not have much to say on this question, which is about the conscientious objection provision in the bill. What are your views on whether the bill is clear enough on that issue? Should it go further? Do you have any thoughts on institutional objections, where an organisation could say that it is not going to be part of the process?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
It would be good to hear your thoughts on the section in the bill on conscientious objection. Is the section clear enough, and who do you think the provision applies to? Should the provision extend to organisations—potentially, such as your own—so that you are able to say, “As an organisation, we’re having nothing to do with this bill”? We have seen international examples of variation, particularly in Australia, in relation to institutions having a conscientious objection to the legislation. In that wide sense, I would like to hear your thoughts on conscientious objection and institutional objection.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Does anyone else want to come in?