The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1228 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
The result of the division is: For 7, Against 0, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 71 is agreed unanimously.
Amendment 71 agreed to.
Section 12—Copies of certificates to be given to other Registrars General
Amendment 12 moved—[Rachael Hamilton].
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
There will be a division.
For
Gosal, Pam (West Scotland) (Con)
Hamilton, Rachael (Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (Con)
Against
Adam, Karen (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP)
Chapman, Maggie (North East Scotland) (Green)
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
MacGregor, Fulton (Coatbridge and Chryston) (SNP)
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 13 disagreed to.
Section 13 agreed to.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 129 disagreed to.
Section 9—Review and appeal of decisions
Amendments 61 and 62 moved—[Shona Robison]—and agreed to.
Amendment 94 not moved.
Amendments 63 to 65 moved—[Shona Robison]—and agreed to.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Amendment 11, in the name of Sue Webber, has already been debated with amendment 2.
Amendment 11 moved—[Rachael Hamilton].
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
There will be a division.
For
Gosal, Pam (West Scotland) (Con)
Hamilton, Rachael (Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (Con)
Against
Adam, Karen (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP)
Chapman, Maggie (North East Scotland) (Green)
Duncan-Glancy, Pam (Glasgow) (Lab)
FitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)
MacGregor, Fulton (Coatbridge and Chryston) (SNP)
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Amendment 42, in the name of Christine Grahame, has already been debated with amendment 18. I remind members that if amendment 42 is agreed to, I cannot call amendment 19 because of a pre-emption.
Amendment 42 moved—[Christine Grahame].
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
The result of the division is: For 3, Against 3, Abstentions 1.
I use my casting vote to vote for the amendment.
Amendment 42 agreed to.
Amendment 90 not moved.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
The question is, that amendment 43 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 November 2022
Joe FitzPatrick
Amendment 91, in the name of Maggie Chapman, has already been debated with amendment 87.
Amendment 91 moved—[Maggie Chapman].