The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1380 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you. I guess that you were restricted to some extent, and the cabinet secretary would want a degree of focus. I assume that it would be her intention to act on your recommendations. Have you had any indication from the Scottish Government of when it will be able to respond to your recommendations?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Do you expect the Government’s response to say how it will deliver on your recommendations, or do you think it will be more finessed?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Before I ask my questions on resources, I want to pick up on a point that was made during the contribution from my colleague Graham Simpson. He was talking about the complexity of understanding whether the Promise is being delivered. He also read the quote about the urgency of the lived experience, which made me think that it is difficult to know when we have got this right, but it is absolutely clear when we have got it wrong, isn’t it?
When a care-experienced person’s journey is not what it should be, are we putting the urgency on that to, first of all, fix that for that person in the context of the Promise? Are we looking at how we make sure that it does not happen to someone else? When I have come across a care-experienced person who has not had a great journey, the first thing that I have said to them is, “Thank you so much for speaking up, because it is not just about you; it is about all the other folk who are likely to be experiencing it because the system is not working as it should.” Have we managed to join those dots?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Where you see good practice, is that being shared? Are other areas looking at that, or are they saying, “That is Glasgow, so we are not going to do that”? Have they managed to break that down to put the folk that this is about at the heart of decision making?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you. I think that other colleagues have more questions in this area, so I will leave it open.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Thank you. I think that you have answered all my questions.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
That is brilliant. I was just checking who to put my next question to when Diarmuid put his hand up. There is also the aspect of more natural forms of flood prevention and how we help people to understand that a wall will not always be required.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I am keen to ask about some community aspects. Obviously, flooding has a major impact on local communities and, if we are planning to prevent future flooding, such work could also have a huge impact on them, so it is really important that all partners engage local communities in such planning. If you went to Brechin in the aftermath of the flooding there, you would have been able to speak to lots of people who said, “I knew that wasn’t going to work.” Clearly, those people did not feel that they had been engaged.
In contrast, in relation to the work that is being planned in the St Mary’s area of my Dundee constituency in partnership with SEPA, NatureScot, the local council and Scottish Water, it feels as though huge effort is being made to engage with the community so that people understand what is happening. Sometimes, folk might think, “We don’t get flooded, so why is this happening in our area?”, whereas other people might think, “Why are you not doing anything here?” How do we ensure that folk understand what is going on and feel part of decision making so that they maintain interest in the long term? I know that SEPA is really involved in what is happening in Dundee.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
I am certain that a lot is being learned from the project that is under way in Dundee, but, based on your experience, how do we ensure that what is learned is shared across Scotland?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Joe FitzPatrick
Could Gareth Dixon or Will Burnish talk about local government’s role in that, specifically focusing on how you are ensuring that, when there is engagement, it is not just those with the loudest voices who are involved but all communities? There is evidence that suggests that more disadvantaged members of communities are more affected by flooding events.