Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 14 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1380 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Adult Disability Payment”

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

Thank you. I guess that you were restricted to some extent, and the cabinet secretary would want a degree of focus. I assume that it would be her intention to act on your recommendations. Have you had any indication from the Scottish Government of when it will be able to respond to your recommendations?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Adult Disability Payment”

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

Do you expect the Government’s response to say how it will deliver on your recommendations, or do you think it will be more finessed?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Improving care experience: Delivering The Promise”

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

Before I ask my questions on resources, I want to pick up on a point that was made during the contribution from my colleague Graham Simpson. He was talking about the complexity of understanding whether the Promise is being delivered. He also read the quote about the urgency of the lived experience, which made me think that it is difficult to know when we have got this right, but it is absolutely clear when we have got it wrong, isn’t it?

When a care-experienced person’s journey is not what it should be, are we putting the urgency on that to, first of all, fix that for that person in the context of the Promise? Are we looking at how we make sure that it does not happen to someone else? When I have come across a care-experienced person who has not had a great journey, the first thing that I have said to them is, “Thank you so much for speaking up, because it is not just about you; it is about all the other folk who are likely to be experiencing it because the system is not working as it should.” Have we managed to join those dots?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Improving care experience: Delivering The Promise”

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

Where you see good practice, is that being shared? Are other areas looking at that, or are they saying, “That is Glasgow, so we are not going to do that”? Have they managed to break that down to put the folk that this is about at the heart of decision making?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Improving care experience: Delivering The Promise”

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

Thank you. I think that other colleagues have more questions in this area, so I will leave it open.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Flooding in communities: Moving towards flood resilience”

Meeting date: 29 October 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

Thank you. I think that you have answered all my questions.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Flooding in communities: Moving towards flood resilience”

Meeting date: 29 October 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

That is brilliant. I was just checking who to put my next question to when Diarmuid put his hand up. There is also the aspect of more natural forms of flood prevention and how we help people to understand that a wall will not always be required.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Flooding in communities: Moving towards flood resilience”

Meeting date: 29 October 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

I am keen to ask about some community aspects. Obviously, flooding has a major impact on local communities and, if we are planning to prevent future flooding, such work could also have a huge impact on them, so it is really important that all partners engage local communities in such planning. If you went to Brechin in the aftermath of the flooding there, you would have been able to speak to lots of people who said, “I knew that wasn’t going to work.” Clearly, those people did not feel that they had been engaged.

In contrast, in relation to the work that is being planned in the St Mary’s area of my Dundee constituency in partnership with SEPA, NatureScot, the local council and Scottish Water, it feels as though huge effort is being made to engage with the community so that people understand what is happening. Sometimes, folk might think, “We don’t get flooded, so why is this happening in our area?”, whereas other people might think, “Why are you not doing anything here?” How do we ensure that folk understand what is going on and feel part of decision making so that they maintain interest in the long term? I know that SEPA is really involved in what is happening in Dundee.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Flooding in communities: Moving towards flood resilience”

Meeting date: 29 October 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

I am certain that a lot is being learned from the project that is under way in Dundee, but, based on your experience, how do we ensure that what is learned is shared across Scotland?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Flooding in communities: Moving towards flood resilience”

Meeting date: 29 October 2025

Joe FitzPatrick

Could Gareth Dixon or Will Burnish talk about local government’s role in that, specifically focusing on how you are ensuring that, when there is engagement, it is not just those with the loudest voices who are involved but all communities? There is evidence that suggests that more disadvantaged members of communities are more affected by flooding events.