The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1217 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
That is helpful—thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
I apologise for not asking Katie MacGregor whether she wanted to comment on that.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
On the BMA’s view about the process of a critical review, the ultimate test of the robustness of scientific research is normally a peer review process. Apart from the University of York, which I think was a partner rather than a peer reviewer, are you aware of that having happened before the publication of the Cass review? Normally, there would be a peer review before someone published a paper in, for example, Nature.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
Do you have any thoughts on why there appears to be a difference in this case? As you have said, this evidence exists—it was produced by other people—and it has, in the Cass review, been distilled in a particular way and used in coming to the review’s conclusions. I have no medical training so I will not question that at all. However, it appears that people with similar qualifications and medical experience in other countries have come to very different conclusions. Do you have any thoughts on that? It is never black and white, is it?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
That is really helpful.
You mentioned treatment, so I will home in on one area of treatment about which there is concern, namely, hormone treatments. Prior to the assessment of the Cass review, of the significant numbers of people who came for support, a relatively small number were receiving hormone treatment. That has been suspended.
What are your thoughts on what that means for those young people? I am aware of constituents who, even under the previous system, were accessing hormone treatment by legal private means, with all the risks that go with being unable to get support with on-going assessment of their hormone levels. What will be the implications of the current restriction for young people?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
That is really helpful in distinguishing between puberty blockers and other hormonal treatments. Have other hormonal treatments been restricted as well?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
I totally understand that you will conduct a clinical trial to examine the effects of treatment. However, most of us will have come across trans people who did not manage to receive support. I can remember one man who knew that he was a man when he was at the pre-teenager stage, but went through his whole life until he retired before being able to take affirmative action on that. That is someone whose life has not been as full as it might have been, had he had affirmative treatment sooner. Will you also be looking at the issue of not treating people?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
Some of my colleagues might want to probe you a little more on that holistic aspect, which is important.
That has been helpful in laying out some of those points. However, some young people will feel that this is the treatment for them, and that they are being denied even being clinically assessed for the treatment. For them, the trial will be a ray of hope in terms of getting that support. Obviously, it is a UK-wide trial, which is normal for medicines—that is the way that such trials are done. However, is there a route for young Scottish folk to access the trial, and do you know the timetables? Also, do you have any thoughts on what the trial will look like?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
That makes sense, but do you have any idea about when it might be?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Joe FitzPatrick
Just the ones that have been restricted—puberty blockers, but that might be quite coarse language for them.