The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1870 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 March 2025
Bob Doris
I am listening carefully to you, Mr Balfour, and I am not sure what I feel about your amendment, but my question is about something that is not in it. A lot of survivors of domestic abuse are under threat of losing homes in the private rented sector. There are some landlords who are not working at scale and have just one or two registered properties, but there are many large, almost industrial, landlords and letting agencies out there. Do you feel that this should also be a requirement on private landlords and letting agencies?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Bob Doris
As we know, the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee is leading on the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill, but this committee will have an active interest in that piece of legislation, too. In that respect, what are your initial views on the function being given to you by the bill, and your capacity, to be the independent review body, and will that impact on any of your other functions?
I have to say that I was distracted by the financial memorandum in that regard. I note, for the record, that it estimates that
“to monitor, assess, review and report on the progress made towards meeting ... targets and the Scottish ministers’ review of those targets will require 5.5 to 10 full-time staff members, costing between”
£467,000 and £819,000. What level of funding do you need to ensure that this does not impact on ESS’s other functions? That question is for Dr Dixon or Mark Roberts.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Bob Doris
You might say that, Mr. Roberts, but the figures that I saw ranged from around £467,000 up to £819,000. In other words, we are talking about headroom of almost 80-plus per cent above what you think the minimum required to carry out those functions would be. It is a massive range, and if a minister came forward with it, they would be put under quite severe scrutiny. Why is there such a dramatic range in costs? Moreover, do those figures also include the £100,000 of additional money that you contend will be needed for consultancy fees, or are we talking about another £100,000?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Bob Doris
We are not the Finance and Public Administration Committee, but I am minded to note that the cost could be between half a million pounds and £1 million.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Bob Doris
You could be completely right about all of that, Mr Roberts—I am merely questioning the numbers. That is my job here today.
My final question on this issue is this: if we were to approach the £800,000 figure, would it be possible to get in-house expertise so that you did not have to rely on consultants?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Bob Doris
For clarity, are you saying that to get everything that you want to meet these responsibilities in—and I hate to sound glib about it—an all-singing, all-dancing way, the cost would not be £819,000 plus the £100,000 in consultancy fees?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Bob Doris
I am sorry—I thought that you said the opposite. So, we would be nudging £1 million.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Bob Doris
That was helpful. Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Bob Doris
So, unless my briefing paper is wrong—and I am looking at the convener when I say this—it appears that the cost would be £819,000 plus another £100,000.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Bob Doris
Would it be reasonable, Mr Roberts, to have a core range of provisions that are costed, with the ability to flex up and get additional expenditure in years 2 or 3, instead of seeking the best part of a million pounds in year 1?