Seòmar agus comataidhean

Thanks very much.

Before we move on, I have a question that I asked the previous panel because it came up during last week’s evidence. There was a suggestion that it would be important to have a strong link with occupational health in order to be able to collect data, identify trends at an early stage and do proactive work. No one on the previous panel particularly jumped at that suggestion. We heard last week that there would be a greater role for occupational health. Would anyone here commend that?

Mike Corbett has indicated that he would like to come in on that.

While we are trying to avoid duplication, it is important that, if you need to put something into the Official Report, you should absolutely come in and do that—which is what you have done there. Thank you for that.

We will now move on to a question from Katy Clark.

Paul O’Kane has a supplementary question.

That is fine. My silence was because no one was willing to catch my eye.

Do you want to say any more about that, Mr Tasker? I am not remotely trying to be awkward, but the member in charge of the bill, Mr Griffin, will give evidence to the committee and say why he has opted for that number. You have had a discussion with Mr Griffin, and you think that the number is about right. What persuaded you of that? We will need to ask Mr Griffin the same question.

Did you want to come in, Mr Tasker?

Do any of the online witnesses want to add to that?

Norman Provan or Linda Somerville, do you want to come in? Is the balance about right? We heard last week that there is a gap in the occupational health provision across all workplaces in Scotland and a weakness in the collection of good-quality data to be used for analysis. There was certainly a bid last week for occupational health to have a role.

Katy Clark, do you want to follow up on any of that?