The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1877 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2024
Bob Doris
There being no further questions—
Bear with me a second. I will just check whether this is a new agenda item. I nearly stayed in the previous agenda item, cabinet secretary.
There being no further questions, we move to the next item, which is formal consideration of the motion. I invite the cabinet secretary to move the motion.
Motion moved,
That the Social Justice and Social Security Committee recommends that the Disability Assistance (Scottish Adult Disability Living Allowance) Regulations 2025 [draft] be approved.—[Shirley-Anne Somerville]
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2024
Bob Doris
Item 6 is consideration of two pieces of subordinate legislation. The first is a Scottish statutory instrument on council tax reduction. It is subject to the negative procedure. The main purpose of the instrument is to update the Council Tax Reduction (State Pension Credit) (Scotland) Regulations of 2012 and 2021.
There being no comments, I ask members whether they are content to note the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2024
Bob Doris
We move to item 7, so we will continue in private.
10:33 Meeting continued in private until 10:43.Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Bob Doris
Thank you for those comments. It might sound as if I am pushing one specific compliance fine, but I refer back to Sarah-Jane Laing’s initial positive comments on the power of a land management plan, and I associate myself with the comments of Mr Bean.
The deputy convener talked about whether compliance should relate to the terms of the land management plan or just to the production of the plan. Sarah-Jane Laing talked about the fact that it would not be a statutory obligation to adhere to every aspect of a land management plan. If it can be proven—of course, it is about how you prove it—that the landowner has not acted in good faith to attempt to implement the provisions of a plan to the best of their ability, should that be a compliance issue?
11:00Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Bob Doris
That is quite helpful. I do not want to misinterpret what you are saying. Rather than there being a statutory duty on the landowner to deliver everything in the land management plan, you seem to be saying that, if reasonable, good-faith efforts have not been made to deliver the contents of such a plan, that should be a compliance issue. Have I interpreted that correctly?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Bob Doris
I have a final question and will go to Gemma Cooper first. If you have any reflections on my previous question, please feel free to share them, Gemma.
Who reports compliance issues or breaches of the land management plan? The bill as it stands is relatively restrictive, in that only certain groups are able to do that. Of course, there is a balance to be struck between the obvious bodies that could report on a potential breach or lack of compliance versus what could be malicious reporting.
I will not come back in after this, convener.
Irrespective of who can or cannot report on compliance or on breaches, should the commissioner be able to undertake proactive work on a small scale in order to see what is happening with land management plans, so that we are not reliant on issues being reported?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Bob Doris
There may be and there may not—we have looked at cross-compliance previously, but it is still not clear whether there will be cross-compliance. At face value, if it costs up to £20,000 to produce a plan and the fine for not producing one is £5,000, there seems to be an incentive either to not produce a plan or to produce one that is pretty threadbare. Do you not see any case for increasing the maximum fine from £5,000?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Bob Doris
Thank you, convener. I apologise for attending the meeting remotely. I have been following the evidence with interest. I hope that the requirement for a break after my line of questioning is not a reflection on me, but there we have it.
To return briefly to the 3,000 hectare threshold, I said last week to witnesses that that is just a number to many people—certainly to someone based in Maryhill, as I am.
Glasgow’s botanic gardens and grounds sit in my constituency—in part, anyway—and they would fit 150 times into 3,000 hectares. It would seem remarkable that, if the gardens fitted only 149 times into 3,000 hectares, they would not be required to have a land management plan. Given that comparison, which I made to make the number real, does Mr Bean have any further reflections? How much more, or how much less, than 3,000 hectares should the threshold be?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Bob Doris
That is really helpful. David Bean, do you have anything to add?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Bob Doris
So, a proactive approach would be helpful?