The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1877 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
That is helpful.
I will bring in the other witnesses shortly but, given that you have a different view, Martin Hall, and that you spoke relatively briefly in relation to reviewing some of the arrangements in principle, how would you respond to some of the concerns that Hamish has put on the record this morning?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
What you are saying is that that should be attended to; in other words, it should not be allowed to happen without more significant compensation for the tenant.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
I will hear Mr Wood and finally Mr Oates.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
I am grateful to you for putting that on the record—I do not think that that was particularly teased out during the session, so I thank you for that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
I am going to let everyone have one more cut at this, if that is okay, convener, because this is quite an important part of the legislation.
Mr Lean, you talked about unintended consequences in relation to some of this stuff and how they might disincentivise landowners from leasing. Do you have any further comments on that, after what we have heard? I want to capture the views of all the witnesses on this particular section, because the committee then has to reflect on them.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Bob Doris
I thank all four witnesses for helping me to get my head around that complex area in the bill. I have no further questions at this time.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Bob Doris
Yes, I think that that point was in your written evidence. I have no further questions on that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Bob Doris
That was a maybe, was it not? [Laughter.]
Mr Thin, do you have any comments on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Bob Doris
I have explored this issue with other witnesses over the past few weeks. I want to turn the whole thing on its head slightly. I will put to one side for a moment the issue of how the role of a land and communities commissioner would sit with the Land Commission more generally.
On who conveys a complaint and whether they would then investigate the complaint, any commissioner would surely have to take a sample-size survey of all land management plans across the country, whether it was 10, 15 or 20—pick a number, I suppose—and then delve into the quality of those plans and general compliance with them in order to have the expertise to, say, share best practice across the country or identify thematic issues. With regard to a specific breach, surely a commissioner should have a discretionary power to investigate and, if we beef up compliance in the act, to take compliance action accordingly.
I have been asking witnesses about that more general picture in the past few evidence sessions. I am consistent, if nothing else, so I am keen to know witnesses’ views this morning. Mr Campbell, what is your view on my suggestion?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Bob Doris
That is very helpful. I did not know that there is a Scottish land matching service. I have learned something, which is always important when we scrutinise legislation.
To go back to land management plans, on reflection, having heard what you have said, Gary, I wonder whether there should be an obligation for land management plans to consider potential future diversification over, for example, 10 years, which the deputy convener spoke about, rather than five years. Land could be screened for its suitability as a crofting venture, irrespective of whether that is in the strategic interest of the landowner. Could that be done when the land management plan is drawn up? Theoretically, that could provide a significant amount of additional land for people who go to the Scottish land matching service because they quite fancy establishing a croft. They could then watch out for future lotting arrangements and declare an interest.
I am trying to work out how we make sense of it in a way that would make a practical difference through the policy that you would like to see propagated. Do you have any reflections on that, Gary?