Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 3 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1876 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Bob Doris

I anticipated that that would be the answer, but it is in the nature of such exchanges that we ask certain questions. Overlap is a theme that comes up quite often. It is not specific to your proposed cross-party group but is a general matter that the committee considers.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups

Meeting date: 28 October 2021

Bob Doris

I just wanted to give you the opportunity to put that on the record.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill

Meeting date: 27 October 2021

Bob Doris

I thank the minister for that response. Those are helpful reassurances. I have no further questions.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill

Meeting date: 27 October 2021

Bob Doris

Given that the minister is here, it would be a shame not to ask one or two questions, to make full use of his time.

I note from the meeting papers that the Scottish Government’s concerns included the UK secretary’s power to appoint the chair and first chief executive officer for ARIA and the possibility of other appointments by the UK Government at future dates that would change the dynamic within ARIA. What is the current situation with that? Have concerns been fully resolved around ensuring that there is no political interference in the independence of the organisation?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 October 2021

Bob Doris

No, I am content, convener.

09:45  

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 October 2021

Bob Doris

So it will return to the committee and we can consider what we are reporting to the Parliament before we report. Is that correct?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 October 2021

Bob Doris

Will that be a formal written report or will it just note the division in the committee? There might be some slight variance in nuance around the reassurances that the committee might or might not wish to seek from the minister. I am keen for that to be clarified.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 October 2021

Bob Doris

The model code was consulted on. I assume that the figure of £25,000 was in the consultation draft of the code. Were there any objections to that value being placed in it? If not, I presume that individuals felt relatively content with it. I was asking for information on that.

Secondly, this is a model code. The minister referred to the fact that it can be adapted by the various bodies, which then seek the Government’s approval. Technically, could the figure vary between different codes or is £25,000 baked into a code that all bodies apply?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 October 2021

Bob Doris

I thank Edward Mountain because he indicated various issues that had not been picked up on but might require a little bit more scrutiny. That is helpful.

Minister, did individuals and groups who responded to your consultation broadly support the £25,000 figure? I suppose that there has to be a figure and you will seek views on it. Were people generally content with it?

The code is a model code so, if a body thought that that value should be lower or higher, could it seek ministers’ approval to vary it?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 7 October 2021

Bob Doris

You might have mopped up what I was hoping to clarify, convener, but I just want to check with the minister that this is not a general obligation to declare one’s dwelling house. One’s interest has to be significant and relevant to and bear on the operation of the public body in question. Will you put on the record that it is not a general obligation?

I suppose that the wider issue that was raised by Edward Mountain is that the requirement mirrors the obligations on councillors, not MSPs. Perhaps, then, the question that we should be asking—perhaps not today, but some other time—is about the difference between the obligations on councillors and the obligations on MSPs, rather than those on members of these boards. I would welcome your thoughts on that, minister. I also seek clarity on the point that there is no general obligation to register one’s dwelling house.