The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2207 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 2, we are considering two instruments, on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Welcome to the 22nd meeting in 2025 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. I remind everyone to switch off or put to silent their mobile phones and other electronic devices.
The first item of business is a decision on whether to take in private items 3 to 10. Is the committee content to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
That concludes the public part of the meeting.
10:02 Meeting continued in private until 10:34.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instruments?
Members indicated agreement.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Okay. That is helpful. For the record, I will err on the side of caution and declare that I chair Moving On Inverclyde, a local recovery service. Thank you.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Okay. My final question is about the framework document, which has been welcomed by the territorial NHS boards. From their perspective, the framework seems to be bringing greater clarity to their relationship with the Scottish Government. Can you share your assessment of how well the framework is working in practice so far?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is the framework helping with the alignment of national priorities and local planning?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
When I read the report, it struck me that the health is a very complex policy area and that governance arrangements will always be challenging, whether it is for a large or small health board area. I think back to when NHS Argyll and Clyde was shut down and moved mostly into NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, with some in NHS Highland. I appreciate that it is very difficult. It will equally be a challenge to keep up with governance, but, with a new way of operating, it is clearly incumbent on the Government to ensure that the arrangements are in place.
Do you consider that the new way of working will make the landscape more complicated to govern, or should it make some of the lines of engagement and governance a bit easier?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
There were two comments that you put on the record, Auditor General. You said that “there is no shortage of senior leaders” on the group, and that the group needs to “find its place”. Ms Cumming highlighted that a formalised approach is being taken, in comparison with what happened previously. I will take it back another level. With regards to the new way of working and the emphasis on cross-boundary collaboration, I would imagine that a body or an organisation such as the group should, in effect, help to make that collaboration better. Planned care has been mentioned. Have you seen any other examples of that collaboration working?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
With regard to the collaboration, you indicated that there is already a statutory requirement. Have you been confident that the governance arrangements for collaboration that exist so far operate well? Looking forward with a new way of working, are you confident that the governance arrangements will keep up?