The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2013 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Thank you for that. As colleagues have no further questions and witnesses do not wish to make any further comments, I thank both Patrick Layden and Charles Garland for their helpful evidence.
The committee may follow up by letter with any additional questions stemming from the meeting. If witnesses wish to add anything after the meeting, they are most welcome to do so, and they should please do so in writing.
I will suspend the meeting briefly to allow our witnesses to leave the room.
11:24 Meeting suspended.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the Scottish Government’s explanation for that breach of the laying requirements?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
McClure Solicitors was a Greenock-based firm with 14 offices across the UK that went into liquidation in 2021. I have had discussions with a range of constituents and with individuals from the legal fraternity who have reached out to me. One question that has consistently been asked is why the Law Society would not have appointed a judicial factor to deal with McClure’s.
McClure’s had an estimated 19,000 individuals with trusts, about 63,000 wills and more than 20,000 powers of attorney, so it had a lot of clients. The question that has consistently been put is why a judicial factor was not appointed. I have met the Law Society, which has given me an explanation as to why no judicial factor was appointed. That explanation seemed to be fair and rational, but in the circumstances that I have just outlined, based on your past experience, do you think that it would have been worth considering the appointment of a judicial factor?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Sure—thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Okay. Thank you very much.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Agenda item 4 is consideration of two instruments subject to the affirmative procedure, on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with those instruments?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
The instrument amends the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 to add Denmark to the list of countries whose citizens are eligible to stand for election as members of a local authority in Scotland if they have leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom.
Under section 28(2) of the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Act 2010, instruments subject to the negative procedure must be laid at least 28 days before they come into force, not counting recess periods of more than four days.?The instrument breaches that requirement as it was laid on 26 March 2024 and comes into force on 7 May 2024.??
In correspondence with the Presiding Officer, the Scottish Government explained that that breach had occurred as it could not lawfully make regulations to implement the treaty until after the UK Parliament completed its scrutiny process, which ended on 25 March. The treaty is expected to come into force on 7 May, at which point the provision in the instrument must be in place to comply with the UK’s international obligations.
As the instrument has not been laid at least 28 counting days before it came into force as required by section 28(2) of the 2010 act, does the committee wish to draw it to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground (j) for failure to comply with laying requirements???
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
With that, I move the committee into private.
11:30 Meeting continued in private until 11:48.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
We also received evidence from the Faculty of Procurators of Caithness. In its submission, it states:
“We are firmly of the view that whatever other provisions may be made, the Judicial Factor should be wholly independent of the Law Society of Scotland, and there should be explicit prohibition of any current officer or employee of the Law Society of Scotland being appointed as the Judicial Factor”.
Do you agree with that suggestion?