The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2013 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
?
Agenda item 6 is consideration of two instruments not subject to any parliamentary procedure, on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instruments???
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
I have one final question in this area. I assume that you are aware of the situation that arose with McClure Solicitors.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Before we move on, and I hesitate to ask this question, but, particularly in respect of that area, would a section 104 order be made use of?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Charles Garland, would you like to come in?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Oliver, before you continue, I would like to follow on from that point.
If a judicial factor were in place for a long time, notwithstanding Oliver Mundell’s question about the ESG investment power, would the bill as it stands provide them with flexibility to consider other investments or other ways to invest? Alternatively, should an amendment be lodged to provide the ESG power, would that be helpful?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Okay. We can look into that.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 3, we will take evidence on the Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill. I welcome Patrick Layden KC TD, who is former lead commissioner at the Scottish Law Commission, and Charles Garland, who is interim chief executive of the Scottish Law Commission.
I remind the attendees not to worry about turning on their microphones, as they are controlled by broadcasting. If you would like to come in on any question, please raise your hand to catch my eye or indicate to the clerks.
Before we move to questions, I invite Patrick Layden to make some brief opening remarks.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
In response to the committee’s call for views, the Faculty of Procurators of Caithness said that there should be a specific procedure for an interested person or organisation to raise concerns about a judicial factor’s management of an estate. Those concerns would first be raised to the accountant and, if the outcome was unsatisfactory, there would then be a role for the court. What does the commission think of that proposal and can you identify its benefits and drawbacks?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
This is the final question. You have said a number of things about the bill as it stands, and there are obviously some differences between the bill and the SLC report. Do you have any final comments or considerations on the views expressed by the stakeholders in relation to the bill?