The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2013 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
On how many occasions has a judicial factor or guardianship been put in place in England and Wales under existing legislation?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 2, we are considering five instruments. An issue has been raised on the following instrument.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
The instrument amends the privileges and immunities afforded to the European Space Agency, the European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere, and their representatives and staff.
In correspondence with the Scottish Government, published alongside the papers for this meeting, the committee queried discrepancies between the instrument and the explanatory note.
The Scottish Government acknowledged that the new paragraph 7 of schedule 15 to the order that is being amended—the International Organisations (Immunities and Privileges) (Scotland) Order 2009—does not operate as the policy intended. It confirmed that it intends to rectify the error at the earliest opportunity.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground (i)—defective drafting—on the basis that the paragraph does not operate as intended, in that a director general, or a person acting in their place, who has a form of British nationality does not benefit from exemptions relating to social security as was intended?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instruments?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Thank you.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Does the committee wish to welcome that the Scottish Government intends to rectify the error at the earliest opportunity, which is anticipated to be in the autumn of this year?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
The Scottish Government confirmed that the explanatory note is incorrect in suggesting that the instrument affords immunities and benefits only to officers who have British nationality. It advised that it intends to correct the text of the explanatory note.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground in respect of the error in the explanatory note?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the document??
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
I can see the challenge if someone reappeared and was fine to take on the management of their finances and their estate again, and I can see the concern about the judicial factor being wound up in a quick process. The flipside of that is not wanting a judicial factor to be in place for an overly long period, while having an element of caution to get the best possible outcome for the person who has reappeared.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Stuart McMillan
In relation to the information gathering powers for the Accountant of Court in section 39, there is an exception to the requirement to comply. That is for United Kingdom Government ministers and departments and bodies exercising reserved functions, such as His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. We have had evidence on that before. They can choose whether to comply.
It may be the case that a section 104 order is, ultimately, required to extend the full scope of the information gathering powers to UK Government ministers, departments and bodies, but we cannot yet be sure that that will happen. If that issue does not get addressed via a section 104 order, does what we have in the bill present any problems for the Accountant of Court? If so, how significant are those potential problems?