The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2261 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Stuart McMillan
The instrument corrects outstanding errors in the Teachers’ Pensions (Remediable Service) (Scotland) Regulations 2023 (SSI 2023/141) that were not corrected by the previous amending instrument.
In correspondence with the Scottish Government, which was published alongside the papers for this meeting, the committee asked why there was no headnote providing that the instrument would be issued free of charge, which would be expected, given that the sole purpose of the instrument is to correct errors. The Scottish Government confirmed that that was an oversight that would be corrected and that any costs incurred by purchasers would be refunded.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground of not including the appropriate headnote for a correcting instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Stuart McMillan
Does the committee wish to welcome that the instrument fulfils commitments by the Scottish Government to correct errors that the committee identified in SSI 2023/141?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Stuart McMillan
The instrument makes amendments to ensure that, subject to the conditions set out in the instrument, people coming to Scotland from Israel, the occupied Palestinian territories—the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and Gaza—or the occupied Golan Heights, are not excluded automatically from entitlement to council tax reduction on account of not being habitually resident in the United Kingdom, the Channel Islands, the Isle of Man or the Republic of Ireland. This is in light of the escalation of violence between Israel and Iran that began on 13 June 2025.
Under section 28(2) of the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Act 2010, instruments subject to the negative procedure must be laid at least 28 days before they come into force, not counting recess periods of more than four days.?The instrument breaches this requirement, as it was laid on 24 July 2025 and came into force the next day.
As required under the 2010 act, the Scottish Government has set out its reasons for this breach in a letter to the Presiding Officer, which will be published in the committee’s report on subordinate legislation that is considered at today’s meeting. The letter explains that, although the need for such regulations became clear in the days following the escalation of violence on 13 June, there was not sufficient time to prepare them prior to recess beginning on 28 June and, as such, it was necessary to make them during recess. The letter also states that the Government considered it necessary for the instrument to be made on that timescale due to the urgent need for support for people fleeing the violence.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament under reporting ground (j), for failure to lay the instrument in accordance with section 28(2) of the Interpretation of Legislative Reform (Scotland) Act 2010?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee satisfied with the reasons provided by the Scottish Government for its failure to comply with the laying requirements?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Stuart McMillan
Welcome to the 23rd meeting in 2025 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. We have received apologies from Katy Clark. I remind everyone to switch off or put to silent their mobile phones and other electronic devices.
The first item of business is a decision on whether to take in private items 5, 6, 7 and 8. Is the committee content to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Stuart McMillan
Also under this agenda item, no points have been raised on the following two instruments.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Stuart McMillan
Does the committee wish to highlight to the lead committee, for its information, the correspondence that was published alongside the papers for this meeting, which, in relation to this instrument, provides an explanation from the Scottish Government regarding the time taken to commence the relevant provisions?
Members indicated agreement.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
That is very helpful. You have indicated that you genuinely want the bank to operate as a perpetual investment fund, but it is clear that the funding rules are getting in the way and are stifling some of that.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is it correct that that would not reduce the level of governance and oversight that the Government and our committee would have in relation to the bank?