The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2013 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Stuart McMillan
Also under agenda item 3, we are considering eight instruments on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Stuart McMillan
In relation to SSI 2024/295, does the committee wish to draw to the attention of the lead committee, the Criminal Justice Committee, the DPLR Committee’s correspondence with the Scottish Government in relation to paragraph 1 of the instrument’s schedule and welcome the fact that the instrument fulfils a commitment that was made by the Scottish Government to correct an error in a date that was inserted by SSI 2024/26?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Stuart McMillan
The first instrument is Scottish statutory instrument 2024/313. This instrument prescribes the information that the chief constable must refer, if held, to the Scottish ministers in relation to an individual whom the chief constable considers is or has been carrying out a type of regulated role while not participating in the protecting vulnerable groups scheme in relation to that type of regulated role.
In correspondence with the Scottish Government, which is published alongside the papers for this meeting, the committee asked a question about paragraph 6 of the schedule, which states:
“Details of the person for whom the chief constable considers that the individual is, or has been, carrying out a regulated role during the relevant period.”
The committee queried whether the term “details” is sufficiently clear to identify what information must be passed on to ministers under that paragraph.
The committee notes that, during the passage of the legislation, it was suggested that that information would be similar to that already required for scheme members, which is limited to the gender and national insurance number of the individual. The committee also notes that “details” could include any number of pieces of information that are held by the chief constable about someone who is not the individual concerned and has no other limits or criteria applying to it.
What details and how much detail will be passed on is not obvious from the instrument itself, and the Scottish Government has noted that guidance will be issued in respect of the exercise of the power. Accordingly, although the Government considers it sufficiently clear, the committee considers that it could be clearer to set out what “details” will encompass.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground (h), which is that the form or meaning could be clearer, as the meaning of the term “details” in paragraph 6 of the schedule could be clearer?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Stuart McMillan
Amendment 6, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 7, 9, 10 and 13.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Stuart McMillan
Amendment 8, in the name of the minister, is in a group on its own.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 5, we are considering the Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill at stage 2. I ask members to refer to their copy of the bill, the marshalled list of amendments and the groupings of amendments.
We are joined by the Minister for Victims and Community Safety, Siobhian Brown, and three Scottish Government officials—welcome to the committee. I remind the minister’s officials that they cannot participate in any stage 2 proceedings, but they can communicate with their minister directly.
We have 42 amendments to the bill to consider and dispose of. If votes are required, I will first call for members to vote yes, then for members to vote no and then for any abstentions. Members should do so by raising their hand; our clerks will collate the vote and pass it to me to read out and confirm the result. I will take stage 2 slowly so that we have time to manage the process properly.
Section 1—Appointment of judicial factor
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instruments?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Stuart McMillan
Amendment 5, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendment 24.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Stuart McMillan
My colleagues and I are delighted that the amendment has been lodged, bearing in mind that it was a recommendation from the committee’s stage 1 report.
Amendment 8 agreed to.
Section 7—Vesting of estate in judicial factor
Amendments 9 and 10 moved—[Siobhian Brown]—and agreed to.
Section 7, as amended, agreed to.
Section 8 agreed to.
Section 9—Remuneration and reimbursement of judicial factor