Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 11 January 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2425 contributions

|

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

A range of commitments have been made to come back to the committee with information, so we will get those responses from you—thank you for that.

I thank the minister and her officials for their evidence. The committee might follow up in writing with any further questions after our final discussions.

That concludes the public part of the meeting.

10:56 Meeting continued in private until 11:42.  

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Okay. I call Jeremy Balfour.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Thank you, minister. I will open the questioning before handing over to colleagues.

Will you explain the general rationale behind the bill and how you think the proposed changes will benefit landlords and tenants as well as the economy generally?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

What you have indicated, particularly at the end, ties in with my next question. Is that the reason why the decision was made to attempt to codify the law in the way that is suggested in the bill, instead of, for example, abolishing tacit relocation or only amending parts of the law that are not working well?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Decision on Taking Business in Private

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Welcome to the 17th meeting in 2025 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. I remind everyone to switch off or put to silent their mobile phones and other electronic devices.

The first item of business is a decision on whether to take in private items 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11. Is the committee content to take those items in private?

Members indicated agreement.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instrument subject to Negative Procedure

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

The instrument seeks to minimise the potential disruption of services and ensure that passengers have continuity of service should operators seek to vary or cancel local services before a franchising framework can come into operation. In correspondence with the Scottish Government, which was published alongside the papers for this meeting, the committee queried an apparent minor drafting error in the instrument. In response, the Scottish Government confirmed that there is a minor drafting error in regulation 7(1), which it proposes to correct by correction slip.

In regulation 7(1), the reference to “paragraphs (2) to (4)” should be a reference to “paragraphs (2) and (3)”. Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground?

Members indicated agreement.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Under agenda item 5, we are taking evidence from Siobhian Brown, the Minister for Victims and Community Safety, on the Leases (Automatic Continuation etc) (Scotland) Bill. The minister is accompanied by Scottish Government officials Michael Paparakis, who is the policy and bill programme manager in the private law unit, and Lori Pidgeon, who is a solicitor in the constitutional and civil law division. I welcome you all to the meeting and invite the minister to make opening remarks.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

I acknowledge that point about the additional sources of funding as well as the point that you raised, Ms Anderson. However, at the very beginning of this meeting, in response to the convener’s questioning, both the Scottish Government and COSLA said that they agreed with the recommendations in the briefing. With that on the record, I would expect local authority areas with a higher level of deprivation and more children with additional support needs to start to get additional resource to help them to deliver the services that are required to help those children and their families.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

Paragraphs 46 to 55 and 59 and 60 of the briefing are interesting with regard to looking ahead and trying to deal with some of the challenges. As I said at the outset, I acknowledge that this area is hugely complex. Every child is different, so trying to do something that broad is very much a challenge.

The briefing mentions the situation with teacher training in ASL and the Scottish Government’s commitment to considering options in that regard. I am keen to understand where the Scottish Government is on the issue of additional training. We have heard that the number of pupil support assistants has increased to 17,046, and that additional training is very much required.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Additional Support for Learning

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Stuart McMillan

I will certainly be in touch with you, Laura, and I will speak to the convener of the cross-party group.

The deputy convener touched on the presumption in favour of mainstreaming. That issue has come up regularly in some of my work with parents. I undertook a survey, which was completed at the end of April. This is the first bit of information on the survey that I will put into the public domain, and I will get back to everyone who responded to it. We asked a question about the presumption of mainstreaming. A total of 29.49 per cent support it, while 70.51 per cent think that it is now past its sell-by date and want to do something different.

As the briefing indicates, there has been an increase of nearly 800 per cent in the number of ASL pupils since the 2004 act came into effect, and I have heard in various fora that the presumption of mainstreaming should be looked at again, potentially.

Has any work has been undertaken or has anything been looked at in that regard?

11:15