The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2013 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Stuart McMillan
Welcome to the 34th meeting in 2024 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. I remind everyone to switch off, or put to silent, mobile phones and other electronic devices.
The first item of business is to decide whether to take items 4, 5, 6 and 7 in private. Is the committee content to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Stuart McMillan
The purpose of the instrument is to make provision about who may make applications for burials and what information should be included in those applications. In correspondence with the Scottish Government, which is published alongside the papers for this meeting, the committee queried whether regulation 3(2)(a)(v) is sufficiently clear to the reader. The Scottish Government acknowledged that the drafting could be improved and committed to amending the instrument at the next available opportunity.
The committee, however, considers that it will be clear to the reader that there is an error in the wording, and it is content that the issue is unlikely to lead to genuine misunderstanding by the reader of the instrument.
Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground in respect of the wording of regulation 3(2)(a)(v)?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Stuart McMillan
With that, I will move the committee into private.
10:03 Meeting continued in private until 10:27.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Stuart McMillan
Amendment 1, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 2, 4, 18 to 21, 23 and 28.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Stuart McMillan
I move on to the second and third instruments on which issues have been raised.
SSI 2024/314 makes detailed provision in relation to every “relevant matter” that might be used for listing purposes and in relation to vetting information that might be included on a scheme record in respect of scheme members under the Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007.
SSI 2024/315 makes detailed provision about what information will be included in level 1 and level 2 disclosures when the new scheme under the Disclosure (Scotland) Act 2020 enters into force.
In correspondence with the Scottish Government, the committee queried whether the provisions in the instruments are intended to prescribe non-disclosable convictions and, in relation to SSI 2024/314, all spent cautions. The Government advised that that is not the intention, and that the legal effect is correct, given the definitions in the parent acts.
Although the committee appreciates that the instruments achieve the policy intention as a matter of law, it considers that it could have been made clear, for example in the accompanying documents, that not all convictions and cautions are prescribed.
Does the committee wish to draw the instruments to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground, on the basis that it would have been helpful, in the interest of accessibility, if the accompanying documents made it clear that not all convictions—and, in relation to SSI 2024/314, cautions—are prescribed?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 4, we are considering an instrument that is not subject to parliamentary procedure and on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Stuart McMillan
That ends stage 2 consideration of the bill. I thank the minister and her officials for their attendance. That also concludes the public part of the meeting, and I will allow the minister and her officials to leave the room before I move the committee into private session.
10:14 Meeting continued in private until 10:20.Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Stuart McMillan
Welcome to the 32nd meeting in 2024 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. We have received apologies from Roz McCall MSP. I remind everyone to switch off, or put to silent, mobile phones and other electronic devices, please.
The first item of business is to decide whether to take item 6 in private. Is the committee content to take that item in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 2, the committee is considering an instrument subject to the affirmative procedure, on which no points have been raised.