The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2261 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
One of the questions that I posed last week was whether, with its proposed codification, the bill would, if it were to pass, help economically. Given what you have both said this morning, my understanding is that you do not think that codification is the right thing to do. However, do you think that the bill would assist businesses in entering and leaving leases?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Good morning, and welcome to the 15th meeting in 2025 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. I remind everyone to switch off or put to silent their mobile phones and other electronic devices.
I want to make the committee aware that Katy Clark will have to leave the meeting this morning, as she is speaking to amendments to a bill that is going through the stage 2 process. Jeremy Balfour is currently at the committee in question, speaking to his own amendments, and he will join us in due course.
The first item of business is a decision on taking business in private. Is the committee content to take items 7 and 8 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Under agenda item 3, we are considering four instruments, on which no points have been raised.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee content with the instruments?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
Is the committee with the instruments?
Members indicated agreement.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
I have a question to ask before I bring in Bill Kidd.
Stacey Dingwall, a few moments ago, you said that you would be “reticent” about repealing the 1949 act and that, if that were to happen, you would need to have some type of backstop to deal with it. You also touched on how the bill will go some way to dealing with your concerns. Are there any other specific things that FSB Scotland would like to have in place if the repeal were to go ahead, whether that is in the bill or as a separate piece of legislation?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Stuart McMillan
As colleagues have no final questions, I thank you for your evidence this morning. Once again, it has been very helpful and thought provoking. It will certainly help us as we continue our deliberations, with the minister in front of us in a couple of weeks’ time. If there are any particular points to make after today, please send them to us in writing—that would be helpful.
That concludes the public part of the meeting. I move the committee into private.
11:39 Meeting continued in private until 12:05.Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
Have you looked at any case studies of what has taken place in Inverclyde? Usually, when I come to the committee, I have something to complain about, but I just want to highlight the excellent practice that has taken place in the Scottish Water flood prevention scheme along the A8. Given the amount of joint and partnership working that Scottish Water had to undertake with the local authority, Transport Scotland, Amey and others, that is probably a good model to look at and potentially to replicate across the country.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
Thank you. That is very helpful. With regard to the finances and the lessons learned, I am not sure whether this work is already due to take place as part of the forensic analysis—I hasten to add that I am not making any accusations; I am just referring to where money has been spent—but it would probably be worth looking at the contracts that were signed with external contractors. Quite a range of external contractors have been involved in the building of the Glen Sannox and the Glen Rosa. Given that the Glen Rosa is still being worked on, whereas the Glen Sannox clearly is not, if you were to look at that aspect with regard to the Glen Sannox in the first instance, that would probably help in relation to the lessons learned if such a piece of work is later undertaken in relation to the Glen Rosa.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Stuart McMillan
One element that has come up in the short time since I have been back on this committee is the issue of people coming and going within those bodies. I understand that there are a wide range of factors as to why someone leaves a particular role and moves on to a different role. It is also very common within the civil service for staff to be shuffled around. However, in relation to sponsorship arrangements and the folk who work purely in that sphere, I would be keen to explore whether there could be some mechanism whereby, if staff have built up an expertise and are considered to be high performers in that area, the normal rules would not apply and they would see out a particular project instead of moving on to something else. Personal circumstances will obviously dictate that as well, but we would want folk who are doing a very good job to remain in that role and see a project through.