The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2013 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
Thank you very much, minister. I will open up with a question, before passing on to colleagues.
In your opening comments, you mentioned the issue of whether we should have a definition of framework legislation. In effect, you said that you agree with the majority of the evidence that we have heard, including from academics, that a definition would probably be impossible or far too challenging to undertake.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
With that, if a bill were to be introduced that was defined as a framework bill, would that improve the scrutiny and transparency work that the committees and the Parliament undertake on such legislation, or is that a moot point?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
Good morning, everyone.
Amendment 524 will repeal section 13 of the 2007 act, which has the provision that currently allows the SLCC to publish a report of a services complaint in certain circumstances. Amendments 526 and 527 are consequential to amendment 524.
Following my engagement with the SLCC, amendment 533, in my name, will allow the SLCC to confirm or publicise that it is investigating a complaint where it would be in the public interest to do so. That provision will significantly enhance the ability of the SLCC to be open and transparent regarding complaints about legal practitioners.
Amendment 534 will allow the SLCC to take a proactive approach to disclosing information regarding large-scale complaints, such as in relation to the case of McClure Solicitors, which colleagues will be aware of my interest in.
I hope that the ability to provide proactive information and disclose the outcome of complaints will significantly improve the information that can be provided to consumers of legal services and improve public confidence. The amendment will allow for greater information sharing between regulatory bodies, where it would support the exercise of the bodies’ regulatory functions.
In terms of what a regulatory body is, the amendment will allow the regulatory bodies to be listed by the Scottish ministers in regulations. Those regulations would be subject to the affirmative procedure. That power may be used only following consultation with all category 1 and 2 regulators—the commission, the consumer panel, the Lord President, and other regulators. The results of that consultation must be published before regulations are laid in Parliament, and the Lord President must agree to the Scottish ministers’ proposal to make the regulations.
I move amendment 524.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
I thank the minister for the work that we have done on the amendments in this group. I am also conscious that the SLCC is supportive of the amendments, which it sees as being hugely beneficial to its work. I saw the SLCC’s frustration at first hand at the public events that I held in Greenock regarding McClure Solicitors.
Marie McNair will later move amendments 526, 527, 533 and 534, because I must return to the meeting of another committee, which I convene.
I urge members to support my amendments and I press amendment 524.
Amendment 524 agreed to.
Section 54, as amended, agreed to.
After section 54
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
On the headroom aspect that Jamie Greene talked about—I do not disagree with him on that—is it prudent for the Government to operate that way in relation to headroom, bearing in mind the huge economic shocks that not just the Scottish economy but the global economy have gone through in recent years? Who knows what shocks will come in the future?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
What does the value for money assessment process involve?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
You mentioned the framework and the clear processes that are in place. I am new to the committee, so this question might have been asked at some point in the past. Has that information been presented to the committee in the past?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
Finally, just for clarity on the economic impact, having talked to local businesses in Port Glasgow, and particularly those that open early in the mornings because of the yard, I know that, if the yard was not there, Port Glasgow town centre would be hugely and adversely affected. Shops would shut, more people would lose their jobs, and the economic impact on the town would be great. I grew up in Port Glasgow. I remember what it was like in the 1980s, and I can assure you that I do not want to go back to that situation. People who live in the town or in the wider Inverclyde area would not want that, either. I cannot stress enough that point about the direct and indirect impacts on the economy of the wider town.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
We are talking about Ferguson Marine at the moment, but I assume that the counterfactual and value for money assessment would be considered for any other project that the Government is working on with regards to the new assets.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Stuart McMillan
The issue of commercial sensitivity has been touched on already—Gregor Irwin highlighted it. The committee is keen to get a bit more clarity on what determines and constitutes commercial sensitivity and how that determination is made.